Ernesto Escobedo vs Darian King — Lexington CH Quarter-final

Lexington CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
MEX7
Ernesto Escobedo
#1650ATP
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 26 July 2021
hard
BAR
Darian King
#1296ATP
34 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWLLLLW
Escobedo E.
7-5 6-0
King D.
Escobedo E.
762
King D.
500

Ernesto Escobedo defeated Darian King 7-5 6-0 in the Lexington CH quarter-final on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Escobedo E.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs King D.

King D.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Escobedo E.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Escobedo E.King D.
1st serve in·Even
64%
67%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
70%
63%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
64%
59%
Return points won·Even
37%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
52%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.9
1.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.5
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (174 vs 50). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Escobedo E.King D.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
28
33
Break points saved·Dominant
84
37
Break points won·Clear edge
12
34
Deciding sets·Dominant
16
83
Tiebreaks·Dominant
72
19

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Escobedo E.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
King D.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.1
Surface form
2.7
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
5.2
Minutes 14d
9.3
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Surface transition
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Kubler J.
Tabilo A.[6]
7-56-727-5
Semi-finals
Kubler J.
Escobedo E.[7]
6-26-3
Tabilo A.[6]
Kokkinakis T.[8]
7-636-776-3
Quarter-finals
Kubler J.
Olivieri G.
4-66-37-5
Escobedo E.[7]
King D.
7-56-0
Tabilo A.[6]
Ramanathan R.
7-646-4
Kokkinakis T.[8]
Brooksby J.[1]
6-42-66-4
R16
Olivieri G.
Mukund S.
6-36-3
King D.
Cressy M.[3]
4-67-626-2
Escobedo E.[7]
Cid R.
6-47-61
Tabilo A.[6]
Kozlov S.
6-26-2
Ramanathan R.
Polansky P.
6-46-4
Kokkinakis T.[8]
Ficovich J.
6-14-66-3
Kubler J.
Mchugh A.
6-46-4
Brooksby J.[1]
Blanch U.
6-766-5
R32
Ficovich J.
Leshem E.
6-16-2
Olivieri G.
Krueger M.
6-46-4
Mukund S.
Schnur B.
6-36-4
Mchugh A.
Mejia N.
7-634-66-1
Kubler J.
Gomez E.[5]
6-13-67-66
Cressy M.[3]
Ito T.
4-66-36-4
King D.
Quiroz R.
6-46-1
Escobedo E.[7]
Nanda G.
6-16-4
Tabilo A.[6]
Dostanic S.
6-26-0
Ramanathan R.
Wu T.
6-46-0
Polansky P.
Gunneswaran P.[4]
6-36-4
Kokkinakis T.[8]
Harrison C.
7-55-76-2
Blanch U.
Sekiguchi S.
6-36-4
Brooksby J.[1]
Draxl L.
6-36-3
Cid R.
Torpegaard M.
3-66-46-2
Kozlov S.
Eubanks C.
7-637-66