Miljan Zekic vs Gastao Elias — Poznan CH Round of 32

Poznan CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
SRB
Miljan Zekic
38 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 26 July 2021
clay
Gastao Elias
POR
Gastao Elias
#728ATP
1447ELO
1425Clay ELO
35 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWL
Zekic M.
6-2 7-5
Elias G.
Zekic M.
672
Elias G.
250

Miljan Zekic defeated Gastao Elias 6-2 7-5 in the Poznan CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Miljan Zekic closed it out in two sets, 6–2 7–5.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Zekic M.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Elias G.

Elias G.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Zekic M.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Zekic M.Elias G.
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
55%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
49%
Service points won·Even
60%
60%
Return points won·Even
38%
40%
Break points saved·Even
57%
59%
Aces / match·Even
3.5
3.1
Double faults / match·Even
2.2
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (110 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Zekic M.Elias G.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
22
37
Break points saved·Clear edge
36
57
Break points won·Clear edge
9
24
Deciding sets·Clear edge
68
86
Tiebreaks·Dominant
36
7

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Zekic M.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Elias G.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
6.3
Surface form
5.2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
2.6
Minutes 14d
7.8
7.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Zapata Miralles B.[1]
Lehecka J.
6-36-2
Semi-finals
Lehecka J.
Shevchenko A.
6-46-2
Zapata Miralles B.[1]
Popko D.[7]
1-67-57-5
Quarter-finals
Lehecka J.
Van De Zandschulp B.[2]
7-56-3
Shevchenko A.
Kolar Z.[5]
6-46-1
Popko D.[7]
Kicker N.
3-66-46-2
Zapata Miralles B.[1]
Muller A.
6-27-68
R16
Van De Zandschulp B.[2]
Zekic M.
6-46-1
Lehecka J.
Vukic A.
6-36-4
Shevchenko A.
Ejupovic E.
7-633-67-63
Kolar Z.[5]
Cachin P.
6-44-67-5
Popko D.[7]
Marcora R.
6-06-3
Kicker N.
Guinard M.
6-26-4
Muller A.
Mena F.
6-36-2
Zapata Miralles B.[1]
Moraing M.
4-67-56-3
R32
Van De Zandschulp B.[2]
Michalski D.
6-26-3
Zekic M.
Elias G.
6-27-5
Lehecka J.
Lamasine T.
6-37-5
Vukic A.
Andreozzi G.[8]
6-16-4
Ejupovic E.
Poljak D.
6-26-4
Cachin P.
Domingues J.
6-36-1
Popko D.[7]
Kopriva V.
6-44-67-5
Guinard M.
Orlikowski A.
6-37-5
Muller A.
Couacaud E.[6]
6-36-2
Mena F.
De Jong J.
6-30-66-4
Moraing M.
Kamke T.
6-46-2
Zapata Miralles B.[1]
Coppejans K.
6-16-1
Shevchenko A.
Borg L.
7-56-2
Kolar Z.[5]
Forejtek J.
6-46-4
Marcora R.
Janvier M.
6-36-2
Kicker N.
Furness E.
6-27-5