Darian King vs Maxime Cressy — Lexington CH Round of 16

Lexington CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
BAR
Darian King
#1296ATP
34 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWLLLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 26 July 2021
hard
USA3
Maxime Cressy
#1472ATP
29 yrs · 201 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLLL
King D.
4-6 7-6 6-2
Cressy M.
King D.
47762
Cressy M.
66221

Darian King defeated Maxime Cressy 4-6 7-6 6-2 in the Lexington CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
King D.serving84% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Cressy M.

Cressy M.serving87% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs King D.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
King D.Cressy M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
68%
61%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
63%
79%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
59%
68%
Return points won·Slight edge
40%
33%
Break points saved·Clear edge
52%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.9
13.2
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.9
8.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (50 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
King D.Cressy M.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
33
24
Break points saved·Dominant
37
96
Break points won·Dominant
34
2
Deciding sets·Dominant
83
32
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
19
8

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
King D.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Cressy M.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
2.7
Surface form
3.8
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.3
Minutes 14d
5.1
3-set count
4.0
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
7.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Kubler J.
Tabilo A.[6]
7-56-727-5
Semi-finals
Kubler J.
Escobedo E.[7]
6-26-3
Tabilo A.[6]
Kokkinakis T.[8]
7-636-776-3
Quarter-finals
Kubler J.
Olivieri G.
4-66-37-5
Escobedo E.[7]
King D.
7-56-0
Tabilo A.[6]
Ramanathan R.
7-646-4
Kokkinakis T.[8]
Brooksby J.[1]
6-42-66-4
R16
Olivieri G.
Mukund S.
6-36-3
King D.
Cressy M.[3]
4-67-626-2
Escobedo E.[7]
Cid R.
6-47-61
Tabilo A.[6]
Kozlov S.
6-26-2
Ramanathan R.
Polansky P.
6-46-4
Kokkinakis T.[8]
Ficovich J.
6-14-66-3
Kubler J.
Mchugh A.
6-46-4
Brooksby J.[1]
Blanch U.
6-766-5
R32
Ficovich J.
Leshem E.
6-16-2
Olivieri G.
Krueger M.
6-46-4
Mukund S.
Schnur B.
6-36-4
Mchugh A.
Mejia N.
7-634-66-1
Kubler J.
Gomez E.[5]
6-13-67-66
Cressy M.[3]
Ito T.
4-66-36-4
King D.
Quiroz R.
6-46-1
Escobedo E.[7]
Nanda G.
6-16-4
Tabilo A.[6]
Dostanic S.
6-26-0
Ramanathan R.
Wu T.
6-46-0
Polansky P.
Gunneswaran P.[4]
6-36-4
Kokkinakis T.[8]
Harrison C.
7-55-76-2
Blanch U.
Sekiguchi S.
6-36-4
Brooksby J.[1]
Draxl L.
6-36-3
Cid R.
Torpegaard M.
3-66-46-2
Kozlov S.
Eubanks C.
7-637-66