Roberto Cid vs Mikael Torpegaard — Lexington CH Round of 32

Lexington CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
DOM
Roberto Cid
32 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 26 July 2021
hard
DEN
Mikael Torpegaard
32 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLLW
Cid R.
3-6 6-4 6-2
Torpegaard M.
Cid R.
3662
Torpegaard M.
6421

Roberto Cid defeated Mikael Torpegaard 3-6 6-4 6-2 in the Lexington CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Cid R.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Torpegaard M.

Torpegaard M.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Cid R.

Serve advantage — Torpegaard M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Cid R.Torpegaard M.
1st serve in·Even
60%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
63%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
48%
Service points won·Even
56%
60%
Return points won·Even
40%
38%
Break points saved·Even
51%
49%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.0
4.4
Double faults / match·Even
3.4
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (79 vs 56). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cid R.Torpegaard M.
Clutch Rating·Even
0
4
Break points saved·Clear edge
15
35
Break points won·Clear edge
26
13
Deciding sets·Clear edge
4
16
Tiebreaks·Dominant
1
39

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cid R.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Torpegaard M.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
3.9
Surface form
2.9
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.4
Minutes 14d
8.4
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Kubler J.
Tabilo A.[6]
7-56-727-5
Semi-finals
Kubler J.
Escobedo E.[7]
6-26-3
Tabilo A.[6]
Kokkinakis T.[8]
7-636-776-3
Quarter-finals
Kubler J.
Olivieri G.
4-66-37-5
Escobedo E.[7]
King D.
7-56-0
Tabilo A.[6]
Ramanathan R.
7-646-4
Kokkinakis T.[8]
Brooksby J.[1]
6-42-66-4
R16
Olivieri G.
Mukund S.
6-36-3
King D.
Cressy M.[3]
4-67-626-2
Escobedo E.[7]
Cid R.
6-47-61
Tabilo A.[6]
Kozlov S.
6-26-2
Ramanathan R.
Polansky P.
6-46-4
Kokkinakis T.[8]
Ficovich J.
6-14-66-3
Kubler J.
Mchugh A.
6-46-4
Brooksby J.[1]
Blanch U.
6-766-5
R32
Ficovich J.
Leshem E.
6-16-2
Olivieri G.
Krueger M.
6-46-4
Mukund S.
Schnur B.
6-36-4
Mchugh A.
Mejia N.
7-634-66-1
Kubler J.
Gomez E.[5]
6-13-67-66
Cressy M.[3]
Ito T.
4-66-36-4
King D.
Quiroz R.
6-46-1
Escobedo E.[7]
Nanda G.
6-16-4
Tabilo A.[6]
Dostanic S.
6-26-0
Ramanathan R.
Wu T.
6-46-0
Polansky P.
Gunneswaran P.[4]
6-36-4
Kokkinakis T.[8]
Harrison C.
7-55-76-2
Blanch U.
Sekiguchi S.
6-36-4
Brooksby J.[1]
Draxl L.
6-36-3
Cid R.
Torpegaard M.
3-66-46-2
Kozlov S.
Eubanks C.
7-637-66