Ernesto Escobedo vs Roberto Cid — Lexington CH Round of 16

Lexington CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
MEX7
Ernesto Escobedo
#1650ATP
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 26 July 2021
hard
DOM
Roberto Cid
32 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLLLW
Escobedo E.
6-4 7-6
Cid R.
Escobedo E.
6772
Cid R.
4610

Ernesto Escobedo defeated Roberto Cid 6-4 7-6 in the Lexington CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Escobedo E.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Cid R.

Cid R.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Escobedo E.

Serve advantage — Escobedo E.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Escobedo E.Cid R.
1st serve in·Even
64%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
70%
63%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
52%
46%
Service points won·Slight edge
64%
56%
Return points won·Even
37%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
51%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.9
2.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.5
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (174 vs 79). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Escobedo E.Cid R.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
28
0
Break points saved·Dominant
84
15
Break points won·Clear edge
12
26
Deciding sets·Clear edge
16
4
Tiebreaks·Dominant
72
1

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Escobedo E.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Cid R.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.1
Surface form
3.9
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
5.2
Minutes 14d
7.4
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Kubler J.
Tabilo A.[6]
7-56-727-5
Semi-finals
Kubler J.
Escobedo E.[7]
6-26-3
Tabilo A.[6]
Kokkinakis T.[8]
7-636-776-3
Quarter-finals
Kubler J.
Olivieri G.
4-66-37-5
Escobedo E.[7]
King D.
7-56-0
Tabilo A.[6]
Ramanathan R.
7-646-4
Kokkinakis T.[8]
Brooksby J.[1]
6-42-66-4
R16
Olivieri G.
Mukund S.
6-36-3
King D.
Cressy M.[3]
4-67-626-2
Escobedo E.[7]
Cid R.
6-47-61
Tabilo A.[6]
Kozlov S.
6-26-2
Ramanathan R.
Polansky P.
6-46-4
Kokkinakis T.[8]
Ficovich J.
6-14-66-3
Kubler J.
Mchugh A.
6-46-4
Brooksby J.[1]
Blanch U.
6-766-5
R32
Ficovich J.
Leshem E.
6-16-2
Olivieri G.
Krueger M.
6-46-4
Mukund S.
Schnur B.
6-36-4
Mchugh A.
Mejia N.
7-634-66-1
Kubler J.
Gomez E.[5]
6-13-67-66
Cressy M.[3]
Ito T.
4-66-36-4
King D.
Quiroz R.
6-46-1
Escobedo E.[7]
Nanda G.
6-16-4
Tabilo A.[6]
Dostanic S.
6-26-0
Ramanathan R.
Wu T.
6-46-0
Polansky P.
Gunneswaran P.[4]
6-36-4
Kokkinakis T.[8]
Harrison C.
7-55-76-2
Blanch U.
Sekiguchi S.
6-36-4
Brooksby J.[1]
Draxl L.
6-36-3
Cid R.
Torpegaard M.
3-66-46-2
Kozlov S.
Eubanks C.
7-637-66