Altug Celikbilek vs Johannes Haerteis — Segovia CH Round of 32

Segovia CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
TUR8
Altug Celikbilek
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 26 July 2021
hard
GER
Johannes Haerteis
30 yrs · 196 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLWWLL
Celikbilek A.
6-3 6-4
Haerteis J.
Celikbilek A.
662
Haerteis J.
340

Altug Celikbilek defeated Johannes Haerteis 6-3 6-4 in the Segovia CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Celikbilek A.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Haerteis J.

Haerteis J.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Celikbilek A.

Serve advantage — Celikbilek A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Celikbilek A.Haerteis J.
1st serve in·Even
58%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
47%
Service points won·Even
62%
59%
Return points won·Even
38%
36%
Break points saved·Even
60%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.3
3.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.7
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (191 vs 51). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Celikbilek A.Haerteis J.
Clutch Rating·Even
40
38
Break points saved·Even
73
71
Break points won·Dominant
38
12
Deciding sets·Clear edge
57
76
Tiebreaks·Even
26
25

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Celikbilek A.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Haerteis J.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
10.0
Surface form
4.6
9.06-match win streak
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
4.8
Minutes 14d
8.4
0.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Bonzi B.[2]
Van Rijthoven T.
7-6103-66-4
Semi-finals
Van Rijthoven T.
Grenier H.
7-676-2
Bonzi B.[2]
Moreno De Alboran N.
6-34-66-2
Quarter-finals
Bonzi B.[2]
Svrcina D.
6-36-4
Van Rijthoven T.
Bourgue M.[7]
6-47-63
Grenier H.
Lopez F.[1]
7-666-1
Moreno De Alboran N.
Celikbilek A.[8]
6-46-2
R16
Bonzi B.[2]
Viola M.
6-16-2
Svrcina D.
Olivo R.
6-43-66-4
Moreno De Alboran N.
Ilkel C.[9]
6-46-0
Celikbilek A.[8]
Gabashvili T.
6-33-66-3
Bourgue M.[7]
Moro Canas A.
6-46-2
Van Rijthoven T.
Jaziri M.
4-66-36-3
Lopez F.[1]
Porras J.
6-736-26-4
Grenier H.
Gimeno Valero C.
3-66-36-2
R32
Bonzi B.[2]
Andreev A.
6-726-47-63
Olivo R.
Menendez Maceiras A.
7-56-2
Ilkel C.[9]
Ortega Olmedo R.
3-67-646-4
Moreno De Alboran N.
Vanni L.
6-46-3
Bourgue M.[7]
Jianu F.
6-36-4
Moro Canas A.
Oliveira G.
3-67-666-1
Van Rijthoven T.
Huesler M.[4]
6-767-647-5
Grenier H.
Kotov P.
6-46-2
Porras J.
Moriya H.
7-666-2
Lopez F.[1]
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
6-47-62
Gabashvili T.
Sijsling I.
6-16-3
Viola M.
Basic M.
6-46-1
Celikbilek A.[8]
Haerteis J.
6-36-4
Gimeno Valero C.
Halys Q.[6]
6-37-63
Jaziri M.
Aragone J.
6-756-26-1
Svrcina D.
Ferreira Silva F.[5]
6-40-0