Pedro Cachin vs Joao Domingues — Poznan CH Round of 32

Poznan CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ARG
Pedro Cachin
#1328ATP
31 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 26 July 2021
clay
Joao Domingues
POR
Joao Domingues
#591ATP
32 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLW
Cachin P.
6-3 6-1
Domingues J.
Cachin P.
662
Domingues J.
310

Pedro Cachin defeated Joao Domingues 6-3 6-1 in the Poznan CH round of 32 on clay. Pedro Cachin extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2015-04-06CasablancaQ2clayPedro Cachin7-5 7-6(8)

Serve vs return

This season
Cachin P.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Domingues J.

Domingues J.serving61% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Cachin P.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Cachin P.Domingues J.
1st serve in·Even
63%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
70%
62%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
62%
57%
Return points won·Even
39%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
58%
52%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.9
1.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.1
1.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 139). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cachin P.Domingues J.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
22
0
Break points saved·Dominant
77
23
Break points won·Slight edge
21
16
Deciding sets·Slight edge
11
6
Tiebreaks·Dominant
46
16

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cachin P.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Domingues J.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
4.9
Surface form
1.5
Win streak
0.0Lost last 8
Fatigue & Travel
5.9
Minutes 14d
7.7
7.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Zapata Miralles B.[1]
Lehecka J.
6-36-2
Semi-finals
Lehecka J.
Shevchenko A.
6-46-2
Zapata Miralles B.[1]
Popko D.[7]
1-67-57-5
Quarter-finals
Lehecka J.
Van De Zandschulp B.[2]
7-56-3
Shevchenko A.
Kolar Z.[5]
6-46-1
Popko D.[7]
Kicker N.
3-66-46-2
Zapata Miralles B.[1]
Muller A.
6-27-68
R16
Van De Zandschulp B.[2]
Zekic M.
6-46-1
Lehecka J.
Vukic A.
6-36-4
Shevchenko A.
Ejupovic E.
7-633-67-63
Kolar Z.[5]
Cachin P.
6-44-67-5
Popko D.[7]
Marcora R.
6-06-3
Kicker N.
Guinard M.
6-26-4
Muller A.
Mena F.
6-36-2
Zapata Miralles B.[1]
Moraing M.
4-67-56-3
R32
Van De Zandschulp B.[2]
Michalski D.
6-26-3
Zekic M.
Elias G.
6-27-5
Lehecka J.
Lamasine T.
6-37-5
Vukic A.
Andreozzi G.[8]
6-16-4
Ejupovic E.
Poljak D.
6-26-4
Cachin P.
Domingues J.
6-36-1
Popko D.[7]
Kopriva V.
6-44-67-5
Guinard M.
Orlikowski A.
6-37-5
Muller A.
Couacaud E.[6]
6-36-2
Mena F.
De Jong J.
6-30-66-4
Moraing M.
Kamke T.
6-46-2
Zapata Miralles B.[1]
Coppejans K.
6-16-1
Shevchenko A.
Borg L.
7-56-2
Kolar Z.[5]
Forejtek J.
6-46-4
Marcora R.
Janvier M.
6-36-2
Kicker N.
Furness E.
6-27-5