Tim Van Rijthoven vs Mathias Bourgue — Segovia CH Quarter-final

Segovia CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
NED
Tim Van Rijthoven
29 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 26 July 2021
hard
FRA7
Mathias Bourgue
#2057ATP
32 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLLW
Van Rijthoven T.
6-4 7-6
Bourgue M.
Van Rijthoven T.
6772
Bourgue M.
4630

Tim Van Rijthoven defeated Mathias Bourgue 6-4 7-6 in the Segovia CH quarter-final on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Van Rijthoven T.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Bourgue M.

Bourgue M.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Van Rijthoven T.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Van Rijthoven T.Bourgue M.
1st serve in·Even
65%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
77%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
69%
63%
Return points won·Even
34%
38%
Break points saved·Even
65%
62%
Aces / match·Dominant
10.5
5.8
Double faults / match·Even
2.2
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (119 vs 194). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Van Rijthoven T.Bourgue M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
26
38
Break points saved·Slight edge
90
81
Break points won·Even
1
2
Deciding sets·Dominant
19
73
Tiebreaks·Dominant
61
28

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Van Rijthoven T.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Bourgue M.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.6
Surface form
4.0
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
6.9
Minutes 14d
7.8
7.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Bonzi B.[2]
Van Rijthoven T.
7-6103-66-4
Semi-finals
Van Rijthoven T.
Grenier H.
7-676-2
Bonzi B.[2]
Moreno De Alboran N.
6-34-66-2
Quarter-finals
Bonzi B.[2]
Svrcina D.
6-36-4
Van Rijthoven T.
Bourgue M.[7]
6-47-63
Grenier H.
Lopez F.[1]
7-666-1
Moreno De Alboran N.
Celikbilek A.[8]
6-46-2
R16
Bonzi B.[2]
Viola M.
6-16-2
Svrcina D.
Olivo R.
6-43-66-4
Moreno De Alboran N.
Ilkel C.[9]
6-46-0
Celikbilek A.[8]
Gabashvili T.
6-33-66-3
Bourgue M.[7]
Moro Canas A.
6-46-2
Van Rijthoven T.
Jaziri M.
4-66-36-3
Lopez F.[1]
Porras J.
6-736-26-4
Grenier H.
Gimeno Valero C.
3-66-36-2
R32
Bonzi B.[2]
Andreev A.
6-726-47-63
Olivo R.
Menendez Maceiras A.
7-56-2
Ilkel C.[9]
Ortega Olmedo R.
3-67-646-4
Moreno De Alboran N.
Vanni L.
6-46-3
Bourgue M.[7]
Jianu F.
6-36-4
Moro Canas A.
Oliveira G.
3-67-666-1
Van Rijthoven T.
Huesler M.[4]
6-767-647-5
Grenier H.
Kotov P.
6-46-2
Porras J.
Moriya H.
7-666-2
Lopez F.[1]
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
6-47-62
Gabashvili T.
Sijsling I.
6-16-3
Viola M.
Basic M.
6-46-1
Celikbilek A.[8]
Haerteis J.
6-36-4
Gimeno Valero C.
Halys Q.[6]
6-37-63
Jaziri M.
Aragone J.
6-756-26-1
Svrcina D.
Ferreira Silva F.[5]
6-40-0