Mathias Bourgue vs Filip Cristian Jianu — Segovia CH Round of 32

Segovia CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
FRA7
Mathias Bourgue
#2057ATP
32 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 26 July 2021
hard
Filip Cristian Jianu
ROU
Filip Cristian Jianu
#282ATP
1387ELO
1305Hard ELO
24 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
Bourgue M.
6-3 6-4
Jianu F.
Bourgue M.
662
Jianu F.
340

Mathias Bourgue defeated Filip Cristian Jianu 6-3 6-4 in the Segovia CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Bourgue M.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Jianu F.

Jianu F.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Bourgue M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Bourgue M.Jianu F.
1st serve in·Even
64%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
70%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Even
63%
60%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Even
62%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.7
2.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.3
1.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (194 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bourgue M.Jianu F.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
38
16
Break points saved·Dominant
81
55
Break points won·Dominant
2
52
Deciding sets·Dominant
73
13
Tiebreaks·Dominant
28
1

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Bourgue M.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Jianu F.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.0
Surface form
4.5
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.8
Minutes 14d
6.2
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Bonzi B.[2]
Van Rijthoven T.
7-6103-66-4
Semi-finals
Van Rijthoven T.
Grenier H.
7-676-2
Bonzi B.[2]
Moreno De Alboran N.
6-34-66-2
Quarter-finals
Bonzi B.[2]
Svrcina D.
6-36-4
Van Rijthoven T.
Bourgue M.[7]
6-47-63
Grenier H.
Lopez F.[1]
7-666-1
Moreno De Alboran N.
Celikbilek A.[8]
6-46-2
R16
Bonzi B.[2]
Viola M.
6-16-2
Svrcina D.
Olivo R.
6-43-66-4
Moreno De Alboran N.
Ilkel C.[9]
6-46-0
Celikbilek A.[8]
Gabashvili T.
6-33-66-3
Bourgue M.[7]
Moro Canas A.
6-46-2
Van Rijthoven T.
Jaziri M.
4-66-36-3
Lopez F.[1]
Porras J.
6-736-26-4
Grenier H.
Gimeno Valero C.
3-66-36-2
R32
Bonzi B.[2]
Andreev A.
6-726-47-63
Olivo R.
Menendez Maceiras A.
7-56-2
Ilkel C.[9]
Ortega Olmedo R.
3-67-646-4
Moreno De Alboran N.
Vanni L.
6-46-3
Bourgue M.[7]
Jianu F.
6-36-4
Moro Canas A.
Oliveira G.
3-67-666-1
Van Rijthoven T.
Huesler M.[4]
6-767-647-5
Grenier H.
Kotov P.
6-46-2
Porras J.
Moriya H.
7-666-2
Lopez F.[1]
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
6-47-62
Gabashvili T.
Sijsling I.
6-16-3
Viola M.
Basic M.
6-46-1
Celikbilek A.[8]
Haerteis J.
6-36-4
Gimeno Valero C.
Halys Q.[6]
6-37-63
Jaziri M.
Aragone J.
6-756-26-1
Svrcina D.
Ferreira Silva F.[5]
6-40-0