Matteo Viola vs Mirza Basic — Segovia CH Round of 32

Segovia CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ITA
Matteo Viola
39 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 26 July 2021
hard
Mirza Basic
BIH
Mirza Basic
#602ATP
35 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWLWWW
Viola M.
6-4 6-1
Basic M.
Viola M.
662
Basic M.
410

Matteo Viola defeated Mirza Basic 6-4 6-1 in the Segovia CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Matteo Viola came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Matteo Viola extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2015-05-24Roland GarrosQ1clayMatteo Viola6-2 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Viola M.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Basic M.

Basic M.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Viola M.

Serve advantage — Basic M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Viola M.Basic M.
1st serve in·Even
65%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
63%
69%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
45%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
57%
62%
Return points won·Even
40%
38%
Break points saved·Even
53%
57%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.3
3.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.7
1.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (63 vs 164). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Viola M.Basic M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
8
33
Break points saved·Dominant
20
56
Break points won·Clear edge
25
4
Deciding sets·Dominant
15
66
Tiebreaks·Even
70
67

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Viola M.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Basic M.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
5.6
Surface form
6.9
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.9
Minutes 14d
5.3
7.0
3-set count
4.0
7.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Bonzi B.[2]
Van Rijthoven T.
7-6103-66-4
Semi-finals
Van Rijthoven T.
Grenier H.
7-676-2
Bonzi B.[2]
Moreno De Alboran N.
6-34-66-2
Quarter-finals
Bonzi B.[2]
Svrcina D.
6-36-4
Van Rijthoven T.
Bourgue M.[7]
6-47-63
Grenier H.
Lopez F.[1]
7-666-1
Moreno De Alboran N.
Celikbilek A.[8]
6-46-2
R16
Bonzi B.[2]
Viola M.
6-16-2
Svrcina D.
Olivo R.
6-43-66-4
Moreno De Alboran N.
Ilkel C.[9]
6-46-0
Celikbilek A.[8]
Gabashvili T.
6-33-66-3
Bourgue M.[7]
Moro Canas A.
6-46-2
Van Rijthoven T.
Jaziri M.
4-66-36-3
Lopez F.[1]
Porras J.
6-736-26-4
Grenier H.
Gimeno Valero C.
3-66-36-2
R32
Bonzi B.[2]
Andreev A.
6-726-47-63
Olivo R.
Menendez Maceiras A.
7-56-2
Ilkel C.[9]
Ortega Olmedo R.
3-67-646-4
Moreno De Alboran N.
Vanni L.
6-46-3
Bourgue M.[7]
Jianu F.
6-36-4
Moro Canas A.
Oliveira G.
3-67-666-1
Van Rijthoven T.
Huesler M.[4]
6-767-647-5
Grenier H.
Kotov P.
6-46-2
Porras J.
Moriya H.
7-666-2
Lopez F.[1]
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
6-47-62
Gabashvili T.
Sijsling I.
6-16-3
Viola M.
Basic M.
6-46-1
Celikbilek A.[8]
Haerteis J.
6-36-4
Gimeno Valero C.
Halys Q.[6]
6-37-63
Jaziri M.
Aragone J.
6-756-26-1
Svrcina D.
Ferreira Silva F.[5]
6-40-0