Carlos Taberner vs Nino Serdarusic — Umag Round of 32

Umag · ATP · Round of 32
Carlos Taberner
ESP
Carlos Taberner
#194ATP
1610ELO
1605Clay ELO
$102kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
28 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLWWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 19 July 2021
clay
CRO
Nino Serdarusic
#1471ATP
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLWLL
Taberner C.
6-2 6-2
Serdarusic N.
Taberner C.
662
Serdarusic N.
220

Carlos Taberner defeated Nino Serdarusic 6-2 6-2 in the Umag round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Taberner C.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Serdarusic N.

Serdarusic N.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Taberner C.

Serve advantage — Taberner C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Taberner C.Serdarusic N.
1st serve in·Even
63%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
65%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
50%
Service points won·Even
59%
63%
Return points won·Slight edge
43%
36%
Break points saved·Even
58%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.6
4.9
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.5
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Taberner C.Serdarusic N.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
53
8
Break points saved·Slight edge
74
66
Break points won·Dominant
59
5
Deciding sets·Dominant
75
10
Tiebreaks·Even
22
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Taberner C.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Serdarusic N.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.8
Surface form
3.7
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
1.7
Minutes 14d
4.6
0.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Alcaraz C.[7]
Gasquet R.[4]
6-26-2
Semi-finals
Gasquet R.[4]
Altmaier D.
7-623-66-3
Alcaraz C.[7]
Ramos A.[1]
6-27-63
Quarter-finals
Altmaier D.
Lajovic D.[2]
6-26-4
Gasquet R.[4]
Dzumhur D.
6-37-67
Alcaraz C.[7]
Krajinovic F.[3]
7-632-66-1
Ramos A.[1]
Travaglia S.
6-26-1
R16
Dzumhur D.
Cecchinato M.[4]
6-36-1
Ramos A.[1]
Ajdukovic D.
7-56-4
Lajovic D.[2]
Zapata Miralles B.
7-56-4
Altmaier D.
Mager G.[8]
4-66-17-5
Alcaraz C.[7]
Martin A.
6-36-1
Krajinovic F.[3]
Albot R.
6-46-2
Travaglia S.
Taberner C.
6-46-3
Gasquet R.[4]
Giannessi A.
7-646-4
R32
Cecchinato M.[4]
Bedene A.[5]
6-16-4
Altmaier D.
Moutet C.
5-76-10-0
Zapata Miralles B.
Cuevas P.
4-66-26-4
Mager G.[8]
Martinez P.
0-66-36-3
Giannessi A.
Vesely J.
7-647-5
Dzumhur D.
Horansky F.
6-46-3
Alcaraz C.[7]
Pouille L.
3-66-26-2
Martin A.
Olivo R.
1-66-27-61
Travaglia S.
Munar J.[6]
6-37-61
Taberner C.
Serdarusic N.
6-26-2
Ajdukovic D.
Collarini A.
6-36-2
Albot R.
Rune H.
1-66-36-2