Govind Nanda vs Roberto Quiroz — Cary 1 CH Round of 32

Cary 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA
Govind Nanda
#781ATP
25 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 19 July 2021
hard
ECU
Roberto Quiroz
34 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLLLLL
Nanda G.
6-2 6-3
Quiroz R.
Nanda G.
662
Quiroz R.
230

Govind Nanda defeated Roberto Quiroz 6-2 6-3 in the Cary 1 CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nanda G.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Quiroz R.

Quiroz R.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Nanda G.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nanda G.Quiroz R.
1st serve in·Even
63%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
68%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
48%
53%
Service points won·Even
59%
63%
Return points won·Slight edge
41%
36%
Break points saved·Even
56%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.7
4.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.7
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (100 vs 102). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nanda G.Quiroz R.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
5
14
Break points saved·Dominant
38
80
Break points won·Clear edge
22
7
Deciding sets·Even
15
15
Tiebreaks·
—
14

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nanda G.
3.4
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 504 days (−1.5)
Quiroz R.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
1.6
Surface form
1.7
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 7
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
9.2
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Surface transition
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Krueger M.[6]
Ramanathan R.[8]
7-646-2
Semi-finals
Krueger M.[6]
Nanda G.
6-36-2
Ramanathan R.[8]
Kozlov S.
1-66-36-1
Quarter-finals
Kozlov S.
Eubanks C.[7]
5-76-16-3
Nanda G.
Harrison C.
2-67-626-3
Ramanathan R.[8]
Gunneswaran P.[2]
3-67-656-4
Krueger M.[6]
Olivieri G.
6-22-66-3
R16
Ramanathan R.[8]
Galarneau A.
7-644-66-4
Kozlov S.
Cressy M.[3]
3-66-36-4
Krueger M.[6]
Mchugh A.
6-17-62
Olivieri G.
Cid R.
7-666-0
Harrison C.
Torpegaard M.
7-56-2
Nanda G.
Schnur B.
3-67-57-5
Gunneswaran P.[2]
Riffice S.
6-26-4
Eubanks C.[7]
Sock J.
7-647-5
R32
Krueger M.[6]
Blumberg W.
4-66-37-64
Mchugh A.
Mochizuki S.
6-46-766-4
Cid R.
Villanueva G.
3-67-56-1
Olivieri G.
Mukund S.
4-66-27-5
Riffice S.
Ito T.
6-736-47-5
Ramanathan R.[8]
Kovacevic A.
6-45-76-4
Schnur B.
Fratangelo B.[4]
7-653-66-3
Kozlov S.
Young D.
4-66-46-4
Torpegaard M.
Lacko L.[5]
6-46-2
Galarneau A.
Ward J.
7-616-0
Cressy M.[3]
Rubin N.
6-37-65
Sock J.
Blanch U.
2-66-46-2
Eubanks C.[7]
Chrysochos P.
7-56-3
Harrison C.
Sekiguchi S.
6-46-4
Nanda G.
Quiroz R.
6-26-3
Gunneswaran P.[2]
Kwiatkowski T.
6-33-2