Mikael Torpegaard vs Lukas Lacko — Cary 1 CH Round of 32

Cary 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
DEN
Mikael Torpegaard
32 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 19 July 2021
hard
SVK5
Lukas Lacko
38 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
Torpegaard M.
6-4 6-2
Lacko L.
Torpegaard M.
662
Lacko L.
420

Mikael Torpegaard defeated Lukas Lacko 6-4 6-2 in the Cary 1 CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Torpegaard M.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Lacko L.

Lacko L.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Torpegaard M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Torpegaard M.Lacko L.
1st serve in·Even
59%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
48%
Service points won·Even
60%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
34%
Break points saved·Slight edge
49%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.3
5.7
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.4
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (56 vs 60). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Torpegaard M.Lacko L.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
4
26
Break points saved·Dominant
35
86
Break points won·Slight edge
13
8
Deciding sets·Clear edge
16
33
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
39
27

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Torpegaard M.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Lacko L.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.1
Surface form
3.5
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
9.4
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Surface transition
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Krueger M.[6]
Ramanathan R.[8]
7-646-2
Semi-finals
Krueger M.[6]
Nanda G.
6-36-2
Ramanathan R.[8]
Kozlov S.
1-66-36-1
Quarter-finals
Kozlov S.
Eubanks C.[7]
5-76-16-3
Nanda G.
Harrison C.
2-67-626-3
Ramanathan R.[8]
Gunneswaran P.[2]
3-67-656-4
Krueger M.[6]
Olivieri G.
6-22-66-3
R16
Ramanathan R.[8]
Galarneau A.
7-644-66-4
Kozlov S.
Cressy M.[3]
3-66-36-4
Krueger M.[6]
Mchugh A.
6-17-62
Olivieri G.
Cid R.
7-666-0
Harrison C.
Torpegaard M.
7-56-2
Nanda G.
Schnur B.
3-67-57-5
Gunneswaran P.[2]
Riffice S.
6-26-4
Eubanks C.[7]
Sock J.
7-647-5
R32
Krueger M.[6]
Blumberg W.
4-66-37-64
Mchugh A.
Mochizuki S.
6-46-766-4
Cid R.
Villanueva G.
3-67-56-1
Olivieri G.
Mukund S.
4-66-27-5
Riffice S.
Ito T.
6-736-47-5
Ramanathan R.[8]
Kovacevic A.
6-45-76-4
Schnur B.
Fratangelo B.[4]
7-653-66-3
Kozlov S.
Young D.
4-66-46-4
Torpegaard M.
Lacko L.[5]
6-46-2
Galarneau A.
Ward J.
7-616-0
Cressy M.[3]
Rubin N.
6-37-65
Sock J.
Blanch U.
2-66-46-2
Eubanks C.[7]
Chrysochos P.
7-56-3
Harrison C.
Sekiguchi S.
6-46-4
Nanda G.
Quiroz R.
6-26-3
Gunneswaran P.[2]
Kwiatkowski T.
6-33-2