Mikael Torpegaard vs Lukas Lacko — Cary 1 CH Round of 32
Cary 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 19 July 2021
hard
Umpiry Score
Pre-match5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limitedForm & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H5.0
3.1
Surface form3.5
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
9.4
7.0
Prev. match7.0
Surface transition7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts5.0
The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.
Torpegaard M.
662
Lacko L.
420
Head to head
No previous meetings on record.
Statistics
Recent form57%1st serve in57%
67%1st serve points won+2%69%
52%2nd serve points won+5%47%
61%Service points won+1%60%
29%Return points won+6%35%
55%Break points saved55%
4Aces / match+1.45.4
3.8Double faults / match+0.63.2
Averages from each player's recent completed matches (4 vs 20). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Draw
Quarter-finals
Ramanathan R.[8]
Gunneswaran P.[2]
3-67-656-4
Kozlov S.
Eubanks C.[7]
5-76-16-3
Nanda G.
Harrison C.
2-67-626-3
Krueger M.[6]
Olivieri G.
6-22-66-3
R16
Harrison C.
Torpegaard M.
7-56-2
Nanda G.
Schnur B.
3-67-57-5
Olivieri G.
Cid R.
7-666-0
Gunneswaran P.[2]
Riffice S.
6-26-4
Eubanks C.[7]
Sock J.
7-647-5
Ramanathan R.[8]
Galarneau A.
7-644-66-4
Kozlov S.
Cressy M.[3]
3-66-36-4
Krueger M.[6]
Mchugh A.
6-17-62
R32
Harrison C.
Sekiguchi S.
6-46-4
Riffice S.
Ito T.
6-736-47-5
Ramanathan R.[8]
Kovacevic A.
6-45-76-4
Schnur B.
Fratangelo B.[4]
7-653-66-3
Kozlov S.
Young D.
4-66-46-4
Olivieri G.
Mukund S.
4-66-27-5
Krueger M.[6]
Blumberg W.
4-66-37-64
Torpegaard M.
Lacko L.[5]
6-46-2
Cressy M.[3]
Rubin N.
6-37-65
Eubanks C.[7]
Chrysochos P.
7-56-3
Sock J.
Blanch U.
2-66-46-2
Mchugh A.
Mochizuki S.
6-46-766-4
Nanda G.
Quiroz R.
6-26-3
Galarneau A.
Ward J.
7-616-0
Gunneswaran P.[2]
Kwiatkowski T.
6-33-2
Cid R.
Villanueva G.
3-67-56-1