Igor Sijsling vs Nicola Kuhn — Pozoblanco CH Round of 32

Pozoblanco CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
NED
Igor Sijsling
38 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWWLLL
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 19 July 2021
hard
GER8
Nicola Kuhn
#1540ATP
26 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLWWW
Sijsling I.
7-5 0-0
Kuhn N.
Sijsling I.
70–
Kuhn N.
50–

Igor Sijsling advanced when Nicola Kuhn retired 7-5 0-0 in the Pozoblanco CH round of 32.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Sijsling I.serving75% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Kuhn N.

Kuhn N.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Sijsling I.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Sijsling I.Kuhn N.
1st serve in·Even
59%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
53%
Service points won·Even
59%
61%
Return points won·Even
39%
38%
Break points saved·Even
57%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.8
3.6
Double faults / match·Even
1.9
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (27 vs 98). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Sijsling I.Kuhn N.
Clutch Rating·Even
11
14
Break points saved·Even
60
56
Break points won·Even
16
17
Deciding sets·Even
13
10
Tiebreaks·Dominant
27
57

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Sijsling I.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Kuhn N.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.9
Surface form
2.8
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.2
Minutes 14d
6.6
7.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Celikbilek A.[3]
Ilkel C.[4]
6-16-726-3
Semi-finals
Ilkel C.[4]
Geerts M.
6-26-736-4
Celikbilek A.[3]
Barrere G.[2]
4-66-31-1
Quarter-finals
Barrere G.[2]
Zeballos F.
6-46-3
Celikbilek A.[3]
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-36-0
Ilkel C.[4]
Van Rijthoven T.
7-57-65
Geerts M.
Nava E.
7-627-63
R16
Barrere G.[2]
Andreev A.
6-36-0
Zeballos F.
Jianu F.
7-666-4
Celikbilek A.[3]
Gabashvili T.
5-76-36-4
Menendez Maceiras A.
Janvier M.[5]
7-646-3
Van Rijthoven T.
Sijsling I.
6-46-4
Ilkel C.[4]
Moriya H.
6-36-2
Nava E.
Viola M.
7-54-66-3
Geerts M.
Bonzi B.[1]
7-636-2
R32
Barrere G.[2]
Roumane R.
7-656-3
Andreev A.
Ruiz Romero B.
6-06-0
Jianu F.
Alvarez Varona N.
6-26-4
Zeballos F.
Gojo B.[6]
6-47-64
Celikbilek A.[3]
Mansouri S.
6-736-17-64
Gabashvili T.
Martineau M.
6-41-66-4
Menendez Maceiras A.
Barroso Campos A.
6-26-4
Janvier M.[5]
Bourgue M.
6-736-27-612
Ilkel C.[4]
Haerteis J.
6-27-63
Nava E.
Maden Y.[7]
6-17-65
Viola M.
Bellucci T.
6-16-3
Geerts M.
Uchida K.
6-16-2
Bonzi B.[1]
Dougaz A.
4-66-46-3
Van Rijthoven T.
Ortega Olmedo R.
6-36-737-5
Moriya H.
Gomez Herrera C.
3-66-36-0
Sijsling I.
Kuhn N.[8]
7-50-0