Kyrian Jacquet vs Dimitar Kuzmanov — Tampere CH Round of 16

Tampere CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Kyrian Jacquet
FRA
Kyrian Jacquet
#130ATP
1685ELO
1586Clay ELO
$264kYTD
$1.0MCAREER
25 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 19 July 2021
clay
Dimitar Kuzmanov
BUL
Dimitar Kuzmanov
#394ATP
1431ELO
1394Clay ELO
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWW
Jacquet K.
3-6 6-4 7-6
Kuzmanov D.
Jacquet K.
36772
Kuzmanov D.
64651

Kyrian Jacquet defeated Dimitar Kuzmanov 3-6 6-4 7-6 in the Tampere CH round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Kyrian Jacquet came in ranked #130.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Jacquet K.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Kuzmanov D.

Kuzmanov D.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Jacquet K.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Jacquet K.Kuzmanov D.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
68%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Even
62%
61%
Return points won·Even
40%
40%
Break points saved·Even
62%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.2
2.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.0
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 197). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Jacquet K.Kuzmanov D.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
47
16
Break points saved·Dominant
87
61
Break points won·Even
27
31
Deciding sets·Dominant
40
13
Tiebreaks·Dominant
91
25

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Jacquet K.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
Kuzmanov D.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.7+192 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.3Clay Elo 1394
7.6Overall Elo 1685
ELO gap
2.4Overall Elo 1431
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.4
Surface form
5.1
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
3.6
3-set count
0.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Jacquet K.Kuzmanov D.
Freshness·Dominant
84
57

Jacquet K.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 17 games (7d) · Kuzmanov D.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 71 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Lehecka J.
Kicker N.
5-76-46-3
Semi-finals
Lehecka J.
Jacquet K.
6-36-0
Kicker N.
Van De Zandschulp B.[1]
6-33-66-3
Quarter-finals
Lehecka J.
Virtanen O.
6-46-1
Kicker N.
Vilella Martinez M.[4]
7-666-0
Jacquet K.
Blancaneaux G.
6-36-3
Van De Zandschulp B.[1]
Popko D.[5]
6-47-60
R16
Blancaneaux G.
Erler A.
6-34-66-2
Jacquet K.
Kuzmanov D.
3-66-47-65
Lehecka J.
Jarry N.
6-46-4
Virtanen O.
Andreozzi G.[8]
6-26-4
Kicker N.
Muller A.[7]
6-43-66-2
Vilella Martinez M.[4]
Cachin P.
7-56-4
Popko D.[5]
Arnaboldi A.
6-46-3
Van De Zandschulp B.[1]
Krstin P.
6-36-1
R32
Erler A.
Elias G.
6-43-67-5
Blancaneaux G.
Mena F.
6-47-5
Kuzmanov D.
Coppejans K.[6]
1-66-37-66
Lehecka J.
Hoang A.[3]
6-16-4
Jarry N.
Forejtek J.
6-736-36-3
Virtanen O.
Cazaux A.
3-67-656-2
Andreozzi G.[8]
Moraing M.
6-46-1
Kicker N.
Borg L.
6-36-0
Cachin P.
Bobrov B.
6-17-5
Vilella Martinez M.[4]
Domingues J.
4-67-657-5
Popko D.[5]
Luz O.
7-657-5
Arnaboldi A.
Meligeni Alves F.
6-16-4
Krstin P.
Aragone J.
6-46-4
Van De Zandschulp B.[1]
Bonadio R.
4-66-26-2
Muller A.[7]
Niklas Salminen P.
6-26-1
Jacquet K.
Oliveira G.
2-66-13-0