Cem Ilkel vs Tim Van Rijthoven — Pozoblanco CH Quarter-final

Pozoblanco CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Cem Ilkel
TUR4
Cem Ilkel
#1462ATP
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 19 July 2021
hard
NED
Tim Van Rijthoven
29 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
Ilkel C.
7-5 7-6
Van Rijthoven T.
Ilkel C.
7772
Van Rijthoven T.
5650

Cem Ilkel defeated Tim Van Rijthoven 7-5 7-6 in the Pozoblanco CH quarter-final on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ilkel C.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Van Rijthoven T.

Van Rijthoven T.serving91% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Ilkel C.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ilkel C.Van Rijthoven T.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
77%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
54%
Service points won·Slight edge
62%
69%
Return points won·Even
37%
34%
Break points saved·Slight edge
58%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.7
10.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.6
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (191 vs 119). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ilkel C.Van Rijthoven T.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
32
26
Break points saved·Dominant
49
90
Break points won·Even
3
1
Deciding sets·Dominant
70
19
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
66
61

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ilkel C.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Van Rijthoven T.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 56 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.3
Surface form
6.6
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Celikbilek A.[3]
Ilkel C.[4]
6-16-726-3
Semi-finals
Ilkel C.[4]
Geerts M.
6-26-736-4
Celikbilek A.[3]
Barrere G.[2]
4-66-31-1
Quarter-finals
Barrere G.[2]
Zeballos F.
6-46-3
Celikbilek A.[3]
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-36-0
Ilkel C.[4]
Van Rijthoven T.
7-57-65
Geerts M.
Nava E.
7-627-63
R16
Barrere G.[2]
Andreev A.
6-36-0
Zeballos F.
Jianu F.
7-666-4
Celikbilek A.[3]
Gabashvili T.
5-76-36-4
Menendez Maceiras A.
Janvier M.[5]
7-646-3
Van Rijthoven T.
Sijsling I.
6-46-4
Ilkel C.[4]
Moriya H.
6-36-2
Nava E.
Viola M.
7-54-66-3
Geerts M.
Bonzi B.[1]
7-636-2
R32
Barrere G.[2]
Roumane R.
7-656-3
Andreev A.
Ruiz Romero B.
6-06-0
Jianu F.
Alvarez Varona N.
6-26-4
Zeballos F.
Gojo B.[6]
6-47-64
Celikbilek A.[3]
Mansouri S.
6-736-17-64
Gabashvili T.
Martineau M.
6-41-66-4
Menendez Maceiras A.
Barroso Campos A.
6-26-4
Janvier M.[5]
Bourgue M.
6-736-27-612
Ilkel C.[4]
Haerteis J.
6-27-63
Nava E.
Maden Y.[7]
6-17-65
Viola M.
Bellucci T.
6-16-3
Geerts M.
Uchida K.
6-16-2
Bonzi B.[1]
Dougaz A.
4-66-46-3
Van Rijthoven T.
Ortega Olmedo R.
6-36-737-5
Moriya H.
Gomez Herrera C.
3-66-36-0
Sijsling I.
Kuhn N.[8]
7-50-0