Govind Nanda vs Christian Harrison — Cary 1 CH Quarter-final

Cary 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
USA
Govind Nanda
#781ATP
25 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 19 July 2021
hard
USA
Christian Harrison
32 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLWWL
Nanda G.
2-6 7-6 6-3
Harrison C.
Nanda G.
27762
Harrison C.
66231

Govind Nanda defeated Christian Harrison 2-6 7-6 6-3 in the Cary 1 CH quarter-final on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nanda G.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Harrison C.

Harrison C.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Nanda G.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nanda G.Harrison C.
1st serve in·Even
63%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
50%
Service points won·Even
59%
61%
Return points won·Even
41%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
56%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.7
4.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.7
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (100 vs 96). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nanda G.Harrison C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
5
34
Break points saved·Dominant
38
78
Break points won·Slight edge
22
33
Deciding sets·Dominant
15
49
Tiebreaks·
—
12

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nanda G.
3.4
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 504 days (−1.5)
Harrison C.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
1.6
Surface form
6.0
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Prev. match
9.0
Surface transition
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Krueger M.[6]
Ramanathan R.[8]
7-646-2
Semi-finals
Krueger M.[6]
Nanda G.
6-36-2
Ramanathan R.[8]
Kozlov S.
1-66-36-1
Quarter-finals
Kozlov S.
Eubanks C.[7]
5-76-16-3
Nanda G.
Harrison C.
2-67-626-3
Ramanathan R.[8]
Gunneswaran P.[2]
3-67-656-4
Krueger M.[6]
Olivieri G.
6-22-66-3
R16
Ramanathan R.[8]
Galarneau A.
7-644-66-4
Kozlov S.
Cressy M.[3]
3-66-36-4
Krueger M.[6]
Mchugh A.
6-17-62
Olivieri G.
Cid R.
7-666-0
Harrison C.
Torpegaard M.
7-56-2
Nanda G.
Schnur B.
3-67-57-5
Gunneswaran P.[2]
Riffice S.
6-26-4
Eubanks C.[7]
Sock J.
7-647-5
R32
Krueger M.[6]
Blumberg W.
4-66-37-64
Mchugh A.
Mochizuki S.
6-46-766-4
Cid R.
Villanueva G.
3-67-56-1
Olivieri G.
Mukund S.
4-66-27-5
Riffice S.
Ito T.
6-736-47-5
Ramanathan R.[8]
Kovacevic A.
6-45-76-4
Schnur B.
Fratangelo B.[4]
7-653-66-3
Kozlov S.
Young D.
4-66-46-4
Torpegaard M.
Lacko L.[5]
6-46-2
Galarneau A.
Ward J.
7-616-0
Cressy M.[3]
Rubin N.
6-37-65
Sock J.
Blanch U.
2-66-46-2
Eubanks C.[7]
Chrysochos P.
7-56-3
Harrison C.
Sekiguchi S.
6-46-4
Nanda G.
Quiroz R.
6-26-3
Gunneswaran P.[2]
Kwiatkowski T.
6-33-2