Cem Ilkel vs Michael Geerts — Pozoblanco CH Semi-final

Pozoblanco CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Cem Ilkel
TUR4
Cem Ilkel
#1462ATP
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 19 July 2021
hard
Michael Geerts
BEL
Michael Geerts
#328ATP
1400ELO
1383Hard ELO
31 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWLW
Ilkel C.
6-2 6-7 6-4
Geerts M.
Ilkel C.
66362
Geerts M.
27741

Cem Ilkel defeated Michael Geerts 6-2 6-7 6-4 in the Pozoblanco CH semi-final on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Cem Ilkel closed it out in three sets, 6–2 6–7 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ilkel C.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Geerts M.

Geerts M.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Ilkel C.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ilkel C.Geerts M.
1st serve in·Even
58%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Even
62%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
36%
Break points saved·Even
58%
62%
Aces / match·Even
4.7
4.3
Double faults / match·Even
2.6
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (191 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ilkel C.Geerts M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
32
9
Break points saved·Dominant
49
82
Break points won·Even
3
3
Deciding sets·Dominant
70
8
Tiebreaks·Dominant
66
2

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ilkel C.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Geerts M.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.3
Surface form
5.5
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
6.8
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
7.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Ilkel C.Geerts M.
Freshness·
—
89

Geerts M.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Celikbilek A.[3]
Ilkel C.[4]
6-16-726-3
Semi-finals
Ilkel C.[4]
Geerts M.
6-26-736-4
Celikbilek A.[3]
Barrere G.[2]
4-66-31-1
Quarter-finals
Barrere G.[2]
Zeballos F.
6-46-3
Celikbilek A.[3]
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-36-0
Ilkel C.[4]
Van Rijthoven T.
7-57-65
Geerts M.
Nava E.
7-627-63
R16
Barrere G.[2]
Andreev A.
6-36-0
Zeballos F.
Jianu F.
7-666-4
Celikbilek A.[3]
Gabashvili T.
5-76-36-4
Menendez Maceiras A.
Janvier M.[5]
7-646-3
Van Rijthoven T.
Sijsling I.
6-46-4
Ilkel C.[4]
Moriya H.
6-36-2
Nava E.
Viola M.
7-54-66-3
Geerts M.
Bonzi B.[1]
7-636-2
R32
Barrere G.[2]
Roumane R.
7-656-3
Andreev A.
Ruiz Romero B.
6-06-0
Jianu F.
Alvarez Varona N.
6-26-4
Zeballos F.
Gojo B.[6]
6-47-64
Celikbilek A.[3]
Mansouri S.
6-736-17-64
Gabashvili T.
Martineau M.
6-41-66-4
Menendez Maceiras A.
Barroso Campos A.
6-26-4
Janvier M.[5]
Bourgue M.
6-736-27-612
Ilkel C.[4]
Haerteis J.
6-27-63
Nava E.
Maden Y.[7]
6-17-65
Viola M.
Bellucci T.
6-16-3
Geerts M.
Uchida K.
6-16-2
Bonzi B.[1]
Dougaz A.
4-66-46-3
Van Rijthoven T.
Ortega Olmedo R.
6-36-737-5
Moriya H.
Gomez Herrera C.
3-66-36-0
Sijsling I.
Kuhn N.[8]
7-50-0