Maxime Cressy vs Noah Rubin — Cary 1 CH Round of 32

Cary 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA3
Maxime Cressy
#1472ATP
29 yrs · 201 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 19 July 2021
hard
USA
Noah Rubin
30 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLLL
Cressy M.
6-3 7-6
Rubin N.
Cressy M.
6772
Rubin N.
3650

Maxime Cressy defeated Noah Rubin 6-3 7-6 in the Cary 1 CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Maxime Cressy closed it out in two sets, 6–3 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Cressy M.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Rubin N.

Rubin N.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Cressy M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Cressy M.Rubin N.
1st serve in·Even
61%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
79%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
48%
Service points won·Slight edge
68%
60%
Return points won·Slight edge
33%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
13.2
3.9
Double faults / match·Dominant
8.6
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 32). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cressy M.Rubin N.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
24
49
Break points saved·Clear edge
96
80
Break points won·Dominant
2
31
Deciding sets·Clear edge
32
54
Tiebreaks·Dominant
8
80

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cressy M.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Rubin N.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.6
Surface form
4.4
Win streak
0.0Lost last 5
Fatigue & Travel
7.3
Minutes 14d
9.0
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
7.0
Surface transition
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Krueger M.[6]
Ramanathan R.[8]
7-646-2
Semi-finals
Krueger M.[6]
Nanda G.
6-36-2
Ramanathan R.[8]
Kozlov S.
1-66-36-1
Quarter-finals
Kozlov S.
Eubanks C.[7]
5-76-16-3
Nanda G.
Harrison C.
2-67-626-3
Ramanathan R.[8]
Gunneswaran P.[2]
3-67-656-4
Krueger M.[6]
Olivieri G.
6-22-66-3
R16
Ramanathan R.[8]
Galarneau A.
7-644-66-4
Kozlov S.
Cressy M.[3]
3-66-36-4
Krueger M.[6]
Mchugh A.
6-17-62
Olivieri G.
Cid R.
7-666-0
Harrison C.
Torpegaard M.
7-56-2
Nanda G.
Schnur B.
3-67-57-5
Gunneswaran P.[2]
Riffice S.
6-26-4
Eubanks C.[7]
Sock J.
7-647-5
R32
Krueger M.[6]
Blumberg W.
4-66-37-64
Mchugh A.
Mochizuki S.
6-46-766-4
Cid R.
Villanueva G.
3-67-56-1
Olivieri G.
Mukund S.
4-66-27-5
Riffice S.
Ito T.
6-736-47-5
Ramanathan R.[8]
Kovacevic A.
6-45-76-4
Schnur B.
Fratangelo B.[4]
7-653-66-3
Kozlov S.
Young D.
4-66-46-4
Torpegaard M.
Lacko L.[5]
6-46-2
Galarneau A.
Ward J.
7-616-0
Cressy M.[3]
Rubin N.
6-37-65
Sock J.
Blanch U.
2-66-46-2
Eubanks C.[7]
Chrysochos P.
7-56-3
Harrison C.
Sekiguchi S.
6-46-4
Nanda G.
Quiroz R.
6-26-3
Gunneswaran P.[2]
Kwiatkowski T.
6-33-2