Altug Celikbilek vs Skander Mansouri — Pozoblanco CH Round of 32

Pozoblanco CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
TUR3
Altug Celikbilek
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 19 July 2021
hard
TUN
Skander Mansouri
#1250ATP
30 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLL
Celikbilek A.
6-7 6-1 7-6
Mansouri S.
Celikbilek A.
636772
Mansouri S.
771641

Altug Celikbilek defeated Skander Mansouri 6-7 6-1 7-6 in the Pozoblanco CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Celikbilek A.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Mansouri S.

Mansouri S.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Celikbilek A.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Celikbilek A.Mansouri S.
1st serve in·Even
57%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
44%
Service points won·Even
61%
61%
Return points won·Even
38%
36%
Break points saved·Even
60%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
6.3
7.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.7
4.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (191 vs 88). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Celikbilek A.Mansouri S.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
40
2
Break points saved·Slight edge
73
62
Break points won·Dominant
38
8
Deciding sets·Dominant
57
6
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
26
4

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Celikbilek A.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Mansouri S.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
8.4
Surface form
5.0
7.04-match win streak
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
9.3
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
7.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Celikbilek A.[3]
Ilkel C.[4]
6-16-726-3
Semi-finals
Ilkel C.[4]
Geerts M.
6-26-736-4
Celikbilek A.[3]
Barrere G.[2]
4-66-31-1
Quarter-finals
Barrere G.[2]
Zeballos F.
6-46-3
Celikbilek A.[3]
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-36-0
Ilkel C.[4]
Van Rijthoven T.
7-57-65
Geerts M.
Nava E.
7-627-63
R16
Barrere G.[2]
Andreev A.
6-36-0
Zeballos F.
Jianu F.
7-666-4
Celikbilek A.[3]
Gabashvili T.
5-76-36-4
Menendez Maceiras A.
Janvier M.[5]
7-646-3
Van Rijthoven T.
Sijsling I.
6-46-4
Ilkel C.[4]
Moriya H.
6-36-2
Nava E.
Viola M.
7-54-66-3
Geerts M.
Bonzi B.[1]
7-636-2
R32
Barrere G.[2]
Roumane R.
7-656-3
Andreev A.
Ruiz Romero B.
6-06-0
Jianu F.
Alvarez Varona N.
6-26-4
Zeballos F.
Gojo B.[6]
6-47-64
Celikbilek A.[3]
Mansouri S.
6-736-17-64
Gabashvili T.
Martineau M.
6-41-66-4
Menendez Maceiras A.
Barroso Campos A.
6-26-4
Janvier M.[5]
Bourgue M.
6-736-27-612
Ilkel C.[4]
Haerteis J.
6-27-63
Nava E.
Maden Y.[7]
6-17-65
Viola M.
Bellucci T.
6-16-3
Geerts M.
Uchida K.
6-16-2
Bonzi B.[1]
Dougaz A.
4-66-46-3
Van Rijthoven T.
Ortega Olmedo R.
6-36-737-5
Moriya H.
Gomez Herrera C.
3-66-36-0
Sijsling I.
Kuhn N.[8]
7-50-0