Nicolas Kicker vs Leo Borg — Tampere CH Round of 32

Tampere CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Nicolas Kicker
ARG
Nicolas Kicker
#322ATP
1385ELO
1373Clay ELO
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 19 July 2021
clay
SWE
Leo Borg
#534ATP
23 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLLWL
Kicker N.
6-3 6-0
Borg L.
Kicker N.
662
Borg L.
300

Nicolas Kicker defeated Leo Borg 6-3 6-0 in the Tampere CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kicker N.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Borg L.

Borg L.serving54% hold

wins 52% of points on serve vs Kicker N.

Serve advantage — Kicker N.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kicker N.Borg L.
1st serve in·Even
67%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
62%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
50%
45%
Service points won·Even
59%
56%
Return points won·Slight edge
41%
35%
Break points saved·Slight edge
58%
51%
Aces / match·Slight edge
1.3
2.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.9
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 50). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kicker N.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 126 days (−1.5)
Borg L.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.4
Surface form
7.04-match win streak
Win streak
0.0Lost last 5
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
9.3
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Kicker N.Borg L.
Freshness·
100
—

Kicker N.: 18 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Lehecka J.
Kicker N.
5-76-46-3
Semi-finals
Lehecka J.
Jacquet K.
6-36-0
Kicker N.
Van De Zandschulp B.[1]
6-33-66-3
Quarter-finals
Lehecka J.
Virtanen O.
6-46-1
Kicker N.
Vilella Martinez M.[4]
7-666-0
Jacquet K.
Blancaneaux G.
6-36-3
Van De Zandschulp B.[1]
Popko D.[5]
6-47-60
R16
Blancaneaux G.
Erler A.
6-34-66-2
Jacquet K.
Kuzmanov D.
3-66-47-65
Lehecka J.
Jarry N.
6-46-4
Virtanen O.
Andreozzi G.[8]
6-26-4
Kicker N.
Muller A.[7]
6-43-66-2
Vilella Martinez M.[4]
Cachin P.
7-56-4
Popko D.[5]
Arnaboldi A.
6-46-3
Van De Zandschulp B.[1]
Krstin P.
6-36-1
R32
Erler A.
Elias G.
6-43-67-5
Blancaneaux G.
Mena F.
6-47-5
Kuzmanov D.
Coppejans K.[6]
1-66-37-66
Lehecka J.
Hoang A.[3]
6-16-4
Jarry N.
Forejtek J.
6-736-36-3
Virtanen O.
Cazaux A.
3-67-656-2
Andreozzi G.[8]
Moraing M.
6-46-1
Kicker N.
Borg L.
6-36-0
Cachin P.
Bobrov B.
6-17-5
Vilella Martinez M.[4]
Domingues J.
4-67-657-5
Popko D.[5]
Luz O.
7-657-5
Arnaboldi A.
Meligeni Alves F.
6-16-4
Krstin P.
Aragone J.
6-46-4
Van De Zandschulp B.[1]
Bonadio R.
4-66-26-2
Muller A.[7]
Niklas Salminen P.
6-26-1
Jacquet K.
Oliveira G.
2-66-13-0