Michael Geerts vs Benjamin Bonzi — Pozoblanco CH Round of 16

Pozoblanco CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Michael Geerts
BEL
Michael Geerts
#328ATP
1400ELO
1383Hard ELO
31 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 19 July 2021
hard
Benjamin Bonzi
FRA1
Benjamin Bonzi
#102ATP
1749ELO
1713Hard ELO
$396kYTD
$4.6MCAREER
30 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWWWL
Geerts M.
7-6 6-2
Bonzi B.
Geerts M.
7762
Bonzi B.
6320

Michael Geerts defeated Benjamin Bonzi 7-6 6-2 in the Pozoblanco CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Benjamin Bonzi came in ranked #102.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Geerts M.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Bonzi B.

Bonzi B.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Geerts M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Geerts M.Bonzi B.
—
Serve
27
—
Return
32

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Geerts M.Bonzi B.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Even
63%
64%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Even
62%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.3
5.7
Double faults / match·Even
2.5
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Geerts M.Bonzi B.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
9
65
Break points saved·Clear edge
82
96
Break points won·Clear edge
3
27
Deciding sets·Dominant
8
77
Tiebreaks·Dominant
2
90

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Geerts M.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Bonzi B.
7.5
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
0.9Hard Elo 1383
Surface ELO
9.1+330 Hard Elo edge
0.7Overall Elo 1400
ELO gap
9.3Overall Elo 1749
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.5
Surface form
5.2
Win streak
7.04-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
6.8
Minutes 14d
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
6.0
Surface transition
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Geerts M.Bonzi B.
Freshness·Slight edge
89
96

Geerts M.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d) · Bonzi B.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Celikbilek A.[3]
Ilkel C.[4]
6-16-726-3
Semi-finals
Ilkel C.[4]
Geerts M.
6-26-736-4
Celikbilek A.[3]
Barrere G.[2]
4-66-31-1
Quarter-finals
Barrere G.[2]
Zeballos F.
6-46-3
Celikbilek A.[3]
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-36-0
Ilkel C.[4]
Van Rijthoven T.
7-57-65
Geerts M.
Nava E.
7-627-63
R16
Barrere G.[2]
Andreev A.
6-36-0
Zeballos F.
Jianu F.
7-666-4
Celikbilek A.[3]
Gabashvili T.
5-76-36-4
Menendez Maceiras A.
Janvier M.[5]
7-646-3
Van Rijthoven T.
Sijsling I.
6-46-4
Ilkel C.[4]
Moriya H.
6-36-2
Nava E.
Viola M.
7-54-66-3
Geerts M.
Bonzi B.[1]
7-636-2
R32
Barrere G.[2]
Roumane R.
7-656-3
Andreev A.
Ruiz Romero B.
6-06-0
Jianu F.
Alvarez Varona N.
6-26-4
Zeballos F.
Gojo B.[6]
6-47-64
Celikbilek A.[3]
Mansouri S.
6-736-17-64
Gabashvili T.
Martineau M.
6-41-66-4
Menendez Maceiras A.
Barroso Campos A.
6-26-4
Janvier M.[5]
Bourgue M.
6-736-27-612
Ilkel C.[4]
Haerteis J.
6-27-63
Nava E.
Maden Y.[7]
6-17-65
Viola M.
Bellucci T.
6-16-3
Geerts M.
Uchida K.
6-16-2
Bonzi B.[1]
Dougaz A.
4-66-46-3
Van Rijthoven T.
Ortega Olmedo R.
6-36-737-5
Moriya H.
Gomez Herrera C.
3-66-36-0
Sijsling I.
Kuhn N.[8]
7-50-0