Jack Sock vs Ulises Blanch — Cary 1 CH Round of 32

Cary 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA
Jack Sock
33 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 19 July 2021
hard
USA
Ulises Blanch
#1661ATP
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWWWW
Sock J.
2-6 6-4 6-2
Blanch U.
Sock J.
2662
Blanch U.
6421

Jack Sock defeated Ulises Blanch 2-6 6-4 6-2 in the Cary 1 CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Sock J.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Blanch U.

Blanch U.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Sock J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Sock J.Blanch U.
1st serve in·Even
61%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
49%
Service points won·Even
65%
64%
Return points won·Even
36%
36%
Break points saved·Even
64%
64%
Aces / match·Even
6.3
6.8
Double faults / match·Even
3.5
3.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (98 vs 150). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Sock J.Blanch U.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
67
19
Break points saved·Clear edge
96
83
Break points won·Dominant
28
2
Deciding sets·Dominant
86
19
Tiebreaks·Dominant
82
37

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Sock J.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Blanch U.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.2
Surface form
6.2
Fatigue & Travel
6.5
Minutes 14d
8.0
4.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
7.0
Surface transition
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Krueger M.[6]
Ramanathan R.[8]
7-646-2
Semi-finals
Krueger M.[6]
Nanda G.
6-36-2
Ramanathan R.[8]
Kozlov S.
1-66-36-1
Quarter-finals
Kozlov S.
Eubanks C.[7]
5-76-16-3
Nanda G.
Harrison C.
2-67-626-3
Ramanathan R.[8]
Gunneswaran P.[2]
3-67-656-4
Krueger M.[6]
Olivieri G.
6-22-66-3
R16
Ramanathan R.[8]
Galarneau A.
7-644-66-4
Kozlov S.
Cressy M.[3]
3-66-36-4
Krueger M.[6]
Mchugh A.
6-17-62
Olivieri G.
Cid R.
7-666-0
Harrison C.
Torpegaard M.
7-56-2
Nanda G.
Schnur B.
3-67-57-5
Gunneswaran P.[2]
Riffice S.
6-26-4
Eubanks C.[7]
Sock J.
7-647-5
R32
Krueger M.[6]
Blumberg W.
4-66-37-64
Mchugh A.
Mochizuki S.
6-46-766-4
Cid R.
Villanueva G.
3-67-56-1
Olivieri G.
Mukund S.
4-66-27-5
Riffice S.
Ito T.
6-736-47-5
Ramanathan R.[8]
Kovacevic A.
6-45-76-4
Schnur B.
Fratangelo B.[4]
7-653-66-3
Kozlov S.
Young D.
4-66-46-4
Torpegaard M.
Lacko L.[5]
6-46-2
Galarneau A.
Ward J.
7-616-0
Cressy M.[3]
Rubin N.
6-37-65
Sock J.
Blanch U.
2-66-46-2
Eubanks C.[7]
Chrysochos P.
7-56-3
Harrison C.
Sekiguchi S.
6-46-4
Nanda G.
Quiroz R.
6-26-3
Gunneswaran P.[2]
Kwiatkowski T.
6-33-2