Kyrian Jacquet vs Geoffrey Blancaneaux — Tampere CH Quarter-final

Tampere CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Kyrian Jacquet
FRA
Kyrian Jacquet
#130ATP
1685ELO
1586Clay ELO
$264kYTD
$1.0MCAREER
25 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 19 July 2021
clay
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
FRA
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
#390ATP
1387ELO
1376Clay ELO
27 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWWWL
Jacquet K.
6-3 6-3
Blancaneaux G.
Jacquet K.
662
Blancaneaux G.
330

Kyrian Jacquet defeated Geoffrey Blancaneaux 6-3 6-3 in the Tampere CH quarter-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Kyrian Jacquet came in ranked #130.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Jacquet K.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Blancaneaux G.

Blancaneaux G.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Jacquet K.

Serve advantage — Jacquet K.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Jacquet K.Blancaneaux G.
1st serve in·Even
58%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
47%
Service points won·Even
62%
59%
Return points won·Even
40%
39%
Break points saved·Even
62%
58%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.2
3.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.0
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Jacquet K.Blancaneaux G.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
47
15
Break points saved·Dominant
87
62
Break points won·Clear edge
27
14
Deciding sets·Clear edge
40
19
Tiebreaks·Dominant
91
38

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Jacquet K.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
Blancaneaux G.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.7+210 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.3Clay Elo 1376
8.0Overall Elo 1685
ELO gap
2.0Overall Elo 1387
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.4
Surface form
0.9
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Prev. match
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Jacquet K.Blancaneaux G.
Freshness·Slight edge
84
94

Jacquet K.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 17 games (7d) · Blancaneaux G.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 14 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Lehecka J.
Kicker N.
5-76-46-3
Semi-finals
Lehecka J.
Jacquet K.
6-36-0
Kicker N.
Van De Zandschulp B.[1]
6-33-66-3
Quarter-finals
Lehecka J.
Virtanen O.
6-46-1
Kicker N.
Vilella Martinez M.[4]
7-666-0
Jacquet K.
Blancaneaux G.
6-36-3
Van De Zandschulp B.[1]
Popko D.[5]
6-47-60
R16
Blancaneaux G.
Erler A.
6-34-66-2
Jacquet K.
Kuzmanov D.
3-66-47-65
Lehecka J.
Jarry N.
6-46-4
Virtanen O.
Andreozzi G.[8]
6-26-4
Kicker N.
Muller A.[7]
6-43-66-2
Vilella Martinez M.[4]
Cachin P.
7-56-4
Popko D.[5]
Arnaboldi A.
6-46-3
Van De Zandschulp B.[1]
Krstin P.
6-36-1
R32
Erler A.
Elias G.
6-43-67-5
Blancaneaux G.
Mena F.
6-47-5
Kuzmanov D.
Coppejans K.[6]
1-66-37-66
Lehecka J.
Hoang A.[3]
6-16-4
Jarry N.
Forejtek J.
6-736-36-3
Virtanen O.
Cazaux A.
3-67-656-2
Andreozzi G.[8]
Moraing M.
6-46-1
Kicker N.
Borg L.
6-36-0
Cachin P.
Bobrov B.
6-17-5
Vilella Martinez M.[4]
Domingues J.
4-67-657-5
Popko D.[5]
Luz O.
7-657-5
Arnaboldi A.
Meligeni Alves F.
6-16-4
Krstin P.
Aragone J.
6-46-4
Van De Zandschulp B.[1]
Bonadio R.
4-66-26-2
Muller A.[7]
Niklas Salminen P.
6-26-1
Jacquet K.
Oliveira G.
2-66-13-0