Altug Celikbilek vs Gregoire Barrere — Pozoblanco CH Semi-final

Pozoblanco CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
TUR3
Altug Celikbilek
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWWL
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 19 July 2021
hard
FRA2
Gregoire Barrere
#1288ATP
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLLLLW
Celikbilek A.
4-6 6-3 1-1
Barrere G.
Celikbilek A.
461–
Barrere G.
631–

Altug Celikbilek advanced when Gregoire Barrere retired 4-6 6-3 1-1 in the Pozoblanco CH semi-final.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Celikbilek A.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Barrere G.

Barrere G.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Celikbilek A.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Celikbilek A.Barrere G.
1st serve in·Even
58%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
52%
Service points won·Even
62%
63%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
60%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.3
4.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.7
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (191 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Celikbilek A.Barrere G.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
40
50
Break points saved·Clear edge
73
92
Break points won·Clear edge
38
18
Deciding sets·Dominant
57
84
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
26
20

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Celikbilek A.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Barrere G.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
8.4
Surface form
6.8
7.04-match win streak
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Prev. match
4.0
7.0
Surface transition
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Celikbilek A.[3]
Ilkel C.[4]
6-16-726-3
Semi-finals
Ilkel C.[4]
Geerts M.
6-26-736-4
Celikbilek A.[3]
Barrere G.[2]
4-66-31-1
Quarter-finals
Barrere G.[2]
Zeballos F.
6-46-3
Celikbilek A.[3]
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-36-0
Ilkel C.[4]
Van Rijthoven T.
7-57-65
Geerts M.
Nava E.
7-627-63
R16
Barrere G.[2]
Andreev A.
6-36-0
Zeballos F.
Jianu F.
7-666-4
Celikbilek A.[3]
Gabashvili T.
5-76-36-4
Menendez Maceiras A.
Janvier M.[5]
7-646-3
Van Rijthoven T.
Sijsling I.
6-46-4
Ilkel C.[4]
Moriya H.
6-36-2
Nava E.
Viola M.
7-54-66-3
Geerts M.
Bonzi B.[1]
7-636-2
R32
Barrere G.[2]
Roumane R.
7-656-3
Andreev A.
Ruiz Romero B.
6-06-0
Jianu F.
Alvarez Varona N.
6-26-4
Zeballos F.
Gojo B.[6]
6-47-64
Celikbilek A.[3]
Mansouri S.
6-736-17-64
Gabashvili T.
Martineau M.
6-41-66-4
Menendez Maceiras A.
Barroso Campos A.
6-26-4
Janvier M.[5]
Bourgue M.
6-736-27-612
Ilkel C.[4]
Haerteis J.
6-27-63
Nava E.
Maden Y.[7]
6-17-65
Viola M.
Bellucci T.
6-16-3
Geerts M.
Uchida K.
6-16-2
Bonzi B.[1]
Dougaz A.
4-66-46-3
Van Rijthoven T.
Ortega Olmedo R.
6-36-737-5
Moriya H.
Gomez Herrera C.
3-66-36-0
Sijsling I.
Kuhn N.[8]
7-50-0