Jordan Thompson vs Cedrik Marcel Stebe — Newport Round of 32

Newport · ATP · Round of 32
Jordan Thompson
AUS7
Jordan Thompson
#309ATP
1772ELO
1709Grass ELO
$153kYTD
$9.6MCAREER
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWLW
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 12 July 2021
grass
Cedrik Marcel Stebe
GER
Cedrik Marcel Stebe
#366ATP
1556ELO
1463Grass ELO
35 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLWWW
Thompson J.
5-4
Stebe C.
Thompson J.
5–
Stebe C.
4–

Jordan Thompson advanced when Cedrik Marcel Stebe retired 5-4 in the Newport round of 32.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Thompson J.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Stebe C.

Stebe C.serving81% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Thompson J.

Serve advantage — Thompson J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Thompson J.Stebe C.
1st serve in·Even
60%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
66%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
54%
48%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
59%
Return points won·Even
37%
41%
Break points saved·Slight edge
63%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.2
3.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.3
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 125). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Thompson J.Stebe C.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
70
51
Break points saved·Clear edge
97
75
Break points won·Clear edge
24
10
Deciding sets·Slight edge
91
86
Tiebreaks·Dominant
95
68

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Thompson J.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Stebe C.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
8.1+245 Grass Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.9Grass Elo 1463
7.7Overall Elo 1772
ELO gap
2.3Overall Elo 1556
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.1
Surface form
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
4.5
Minutes 14d
9.4
0.0
3-set count
0.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Anderson K.[8]
Brooksby J.
7-686-4
Semi-finals
Brooksby J.
Thompson J.[7]
6-37-63
Anderson K.[8]
Bublik A.[1]
4-67-637-5
Quarter-finals
Bublik A.[1]
Jung J.
6-26-4
Thompson J.[7]
Cressy M.
6-37-66
Brooksby J.
Gojowczyk P.
6-06-3
Anderson K.[8]
Sock J.
6-756-26-4
R16
Gojowczyk P.
Pospisil V.[4]
6-36-3
Brooksby J.
Kudla D.
6-34-67-5
Cressy M.
Querrey S.[2]
6-42-66-2
Thompson J.[7]
Sugita Y.
6-06-2
Anderson K.[8]
Ofner S.
7-57-63
Sock J.
Nishioka Y.[3]
6-26-3
Jung J.
Sandgren T.[5]
6-26-2
Bublik A.[1]
Karlovic I.
7-654-66-1
R32
Thompson J.[7]
Stebe C.
5-4
Jung J.
Schnur B.
7-56-717-64
Brooksby J.
Donskoy E.
7-56-3
Kudla D.
Johnson S.[6]
7-633-66-4
Sugita Y.
Rodionov J.
7-56-3
Gojowczyk P.
Krueger M.
6-26-2
Anderson K.[8]
Marchenko I.
7-56-3
Ofner S.
Uchiyama Y.
6-46-4
Sock J.
Bolt A.
3-66-46-3
Sandgren T.[5]
Sousa J.
6-47-63
Karlovic I.
Zapata Miralles B.
6-756-16-4
Cressy M.
Lorenzi P.
6-16-2