Tennys Sandgren vs Joao Sousa — Newport Round of 32

Newport · ATP · Round of 32
USA5
Tennys Sandgren
34 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 July 2021
grass
POR
Joao Sousa
37 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLLWWL
Sandgren T.
6-4 7-6
Sousa J.
Sandgren T.
6772
Sousa J.
4630

Tennys Sandgren defeated Joao Sousa 6-4 7-6 in the Newport round of 32 on grass. Tennys Sandgren extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2020-09-14Rome MastersQ3clayTennys Sandgren6-3 6-0
2018-10-29Paris MastersQ2hardJoao Sousa6-7(1) 6-3 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Sandgren T.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Sousa J.

Sousa J.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Sandgren T.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Sandgren T.Sousa J.
1st serve in·Even
60%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
64%
62%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Even
59%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.2
3.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.7
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (151 vs 177). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Sandgren T.Sousa J.
Clutch Rating·Even
36
35
Break points saved·Even
92
91
Break points won·Clear edge
2
14
Deciding sets·Clear edge
28
48
Tiebreaks·Dominant
86
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Sandgren T.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Sousa J.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
6.5
Surface form
4.5
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
7.4
Minutes 14d
8.1
4.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
4.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Anderson K.[8]
Brooksby J.
7-686-4
Semi-finals
Brooksby J.
Thompson J.[7]
6-37-63
Anderson K.[8]
Bublik A.[1]
4-67-637-5
Quarter-finals
Bublik A.[1]
Jung J.
6-26-4
Thompson J.[7]
Cressy M.
6-37-66
Brooksby J.
Gojowczyk P.
6-06-3
Anderson K.[8]
Sock J.
6-756-26-4
R16
Gojowczyk P.
Pospisil V.[4]
6-36-3
Brooksby J.
Kudla D.
6-34-67-5
Cressy M.
Querrey S.[2]
6-42-66-2
Thompson J.[7]
Sugita Y.
6-06-2
Anderson K.[8]
Ofner S.
7-57-63
Sock J.
Nishioka Y.[3]
6-26-3
Jung J.
Sandgren T.[5]
6-26-2
Bublik A.[1]
Karlovic I.
7-654-66-1
R32
Thompson J.[7]
Stebe C.
5-4
Jung J.
Schnur B.
7-56-717-64
Brooksby J.
Donskoy E.
7-56-3
Kudla D.
Johnson S.[6]
7-633-66-4
Sugita Y.
Rodionov J.
7-56-3
Gojowczyk P.
Krueger M.
6-26-2
Anderson K.[8]
Marchenko I.
7-56-3
Ofner S.
Uchiyama Y.
6-46-4
Sock J.
Bolt A.
3-66-46-3
Sandgren T.[5]
Sousa J.
6-47-63
Karlovic I.
Zapata Miralles B.
6-756-16-4
Cressy M.
Lorenzi P.
6-16-2