Max Purcell vs Peter Polansky — Nur-Sultan 3 CH Semi-final

Nur-Sultan 3 CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
AUS4
Max Purcell
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 12 July 2021
hard
CAN7
Peter Polansky
38 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWL
Purcell M.
7-5 3-6 7-6
Polansky P.
Purcell M.
73772
Polansky P.
56631

Max Purcell defeated Peter Polansky 7-5 3-6 7-6 in the Nur-Sultan 3 CH semi-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Max Purcell came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Max Purcell extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Max Purcell closed it out in three sets, 7–5 3–6 7–6.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-08-07Canada MastersQ1hardMax Purcell6-2 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Purcell M.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Polansky P.

Polansky P.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Purcell M.

Serve advantage — Purcell M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Purcell M.Polansky P.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
55%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
53%
Service points won·Even
64%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
34%
Break points saved·Even
62%
62%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.6
4.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.9
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 43). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Purcell M.Polansky P.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
59
18
Break points saved·Slight edge
92
82
Break points won·Even
10
12
Deciding sets·Dominant
84
16
Tiebreaks·Dominant
81
19

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Purcell M.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Polansky P.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
2.6
Surface form
3.4
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.2
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
7.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Purcell M.[4]
Clarke J.[3]
3-66-47-66
Semi-finals
Clarke J.[3]
Gojo B.[5]
6-46-4
Purcell M.[4]
Polansky P.[7]
7-53-67-63
Quarter-finals
Gojo B.[5]
Basic M.
2-67-626-2
Clarke J.[3]
Kubler J.
3-67-57-61
Purcell M.[4]
Hsu Y.
6-26-1
Polansky P.[7]
Safiullin R.[1]
6-21-67-64
R16
Basic M.
Peniston R.
6-36-1
Gojo B.[5]
Tseng C.
6-16-2
Clarke J.[3]
Zhukayev B.
6-36-3
Kubler J.
Stakhovsky S.[6]
6-23-66-2
Hsu Y.
Karlovskiy E.
6-36-0
Purcell M.[4]
Wu T.
3-67-646-2
Polansky P.[7]
Kuznetsov A.
6-46-3
Safiullin R.[1]
Chung Y.
6-36-4
R32
Peniston R.
Istomin D.[2]
6-13-66-3
Basic M.
Yevseyev D.
6-36-3
Tseng C.
Denolly C.
6-23-66-3
Gojo B.[5]
Sultanov K.
7-636-1
Clarke J.[3]
Dubrivnyy A.
7-57-63
Zhukayev B.
Chappell N.
4-66-37-66
Stakhovsky S.[6]
Kotov P.
7-56-2
Hsu Y.
Grenier H.[8]
6-46-2
Karlovskiy E.
Catarina L.
6-46-2
Wu T.
Krutykh O.
6-36-4
Purcell M.[4]
Bega A.
2-66-27-5
Polansky P.[7]
Lomakin G.
6-47-64
Kuznetsov A.
Santillan A.
6-46-3
Chung Y.
Bondarevskiy Y.
6-36-4
Safiullin R.[1]
Jaziri M.
6-46-2
Kubler J.
Tashbulatov D.
6-16-3