Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Goncalo Oliveira — Amersfoort CH Round of 32

Amersfoort CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Botic Van De Zandschulp
NED2
Botic Van De Zandschulp
#54ATP
1743ELO
1690Clay ELO
$690kYTD
$6.6MCAREER
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 July 2021
clay
VEN
Goncalo Oliveira
31 yrs · 185 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWWWLL
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-2 6-4
Oliveira G.
Van De Zandschulp B.
662
Oliveira G.
240

Botic Van De Zandschulp defeated Goncalo Oliveira 6-2 6-4 in the Amersfoort CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Van De Zandschulp B.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Oliveira G.

Oliveira G.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Van De Zandschulp B.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Van De Zandschulp B.Oliveira G.
33
Serve
—
74
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Van De Zandschulp B.Oliveira G.
1st serve in·Even
62%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
61%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
60%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.6
3.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.9
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 136). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Van De Zandschulp B.Oliveira G.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
77
0
Break points saved·Dominant
98
64
Break points won·Dominant
68
4
Deciding sets·Dominant
78
1
Tiebreaks·Dominant
81
4

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Van De Zandschulp B.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Oliveira G.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.1
Surface form
2.2
7.03-match win streak
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
3.3
Minutes 14d
7.1
0.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
3.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Van De Zandschulp B.Oliveira G.
Freshness·
89
—

Van De Zandschulp B.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Griekspoor T.[1]
Van De Zandschulp B.[2]
6-13-66-1
Semi-finals
Van De Zandschulp B.[2]
Andreozzi G.[7]
6-746-36-2
Griekspoor T.[1]
Hoang A.[4]
4-66-36-4
Quarter-finals
Van De Zandschulp B.[2]
De Jong J.
6-36-0
Andreozzi G.[7]
Sels J.
3-66-46-2
Hoang A.[4]
Rosol L.[8]
6-47-64
Griekspoor T.[1]
Coppejans K.[6]
3-66-36-2
R16
Van De Zandschulp B.[2]
Moraing M.
6-37-5
De Jong J.
Safwat M.[5]
2-66-16-4
Sels J.
Vatutin A.
6-26-2
Andreozzi G.[7]
Vukic A.
7-52-66-3
Coppejans K.[6]
Brouwer G.
6-36-4
Griekspoor T.[1]
Vrbensky M.
6-46-4
Rosol L.[8]
Nikles J.
6-26-1
Hoang A.[4]
Mena F.
7-647-65
R32
Hoang A.[4]
Maden Y.
6-47-65
Brouwer G.
Jong S.
7-670-0
Moraing M.
Haerteis J.
6-16-0
Brouwer G.
Jong A.
7-670-0
Van De Zandschulp B.[2]
Oliveira G.
6-26-4
De Jong J.
Guinard M.
7-654-67-65
Safwat M.[5]
Elias G.
6-16-3
Sels J.
Aragone J.
6-16-1
Vukic A.
Haase R.
6-47-61
Andreozzi G.[7]
Lehecka J.
7-52-66-4
Rosol L.[8]
Kopriva V.
7-646-2
Mena F.
Bellucci T.
6-36-4
Coppejans K.[6]
Wassermann D.
6-35-76-2
Vrbensky M.
Bergs Z.
6-47-62
Nikles J.
Nijboer R.
7-656-2
Griekspoor T.[1]
Geerts M.
6-27-62
Vatutin A.
Polmans M.[3]
6-746-46-4