Xin Yu Wang vs En Shuo Liang — Prague Round of 16

Prague · WTA · Round of 16
CHN
Xin Yu Wang
1760ELO
1634Clay ELO
24 yrs · 182 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 12 July 2021
clay
En Shuo Liang
TPE
En Shuo Liang
#284WTA
1554ELO
1361Clay ELO
25 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWWLL
Wang X.
3-6 7-5 6-1
Liang E.
Wang X.
3762
Liang E.
6511

Xin Yu Wang defeated En Shuo Liang 3-6 7-5 6-1 in the Prague round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — En Shuo Liang came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Xin Yu Wang claimed a first win over En Shuo Liang in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2020-02-10Hua HinR32hardEn Shuo Liang6-3 6-0

Serve vs return

This season
Wang X.serving67% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Liang E.

Liang E.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Wang X.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Wang X.Liang E.
—
Serve
—
0
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Wang X.Liang E.
1st serve in·Even
61%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
63%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
45%
Service points won·Even
58%
56%
Return points won·Even
42%
45%
Break points saved·Even
56%
55%
Aces / match·Even
2.6
2.5
Double faults / match·Even
3.3
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 113). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Wang X.Liang E.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
60
26
Break points saved·Dominant
86
41
Break points won·Dominant
78
51
Deciding sets·Dominant
86
32
Tiebreaks·Dominant
4
94

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Wang X.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Liang E.
4.1
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
9.1+273 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.9Clay Elo 1361
8.7Overall Elo 1760
ELO gap
1.3Overall Elo 1554
5.0
H2H
5.0
0.0Lost last 6
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
9.4
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
3.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Weather
21°CPartly cloudy
Wind 4 km/hHumidity 60%

Draw

Final
Krejcikova B.[2]
Martincova T.[8]
6-26-0
Semi-finals
Martincova T.[8]
Minnen G.[9]
6-36-4
Krejcikova B.[2]
Wang X.
6-16-2
Quarter-finals
Wang X.
Min G.
6-36-3
Martincova T.[8]
Hruncakova V.
6-26-2
Minnen G.[9]
Hunter S.
6-26-1
Krejcikova B.[2]
Siniakova K.[5]
6-36-0
R16
Min G.
Stojanovic N.[7]
3-66-16-4
Wang X.
Liang E.
3-67-56-1
Krejcikova B.[2]
Bonaventure Y.
7-626-4
Martincova T.[8]
Muhammad A.
6-36-4
Minnen G.[9]
Gasanova A.
6-37-63
Siniakova K.[5]
Smitkova T.
2-67-636-3
Hruncakova V.
Sramkova R.
6-47-5
Hunter S.
Parrizas Diaz N.
4-66-36-1
R32
Siniakova K.[5]
Burrage J.
6-06-4
Martincova T.[8]
Murray S.
6-16-4
Hunter S.
Bouzkova M.[4]
3-66-46-2
Min G.
Stosur S.
6-32-66-3
Sramkova R.
Kvitova P.[1]
7-653-66-4
Liang E.
Perrin C.
6-36-4
Muhammad A.
Cabrera L.
3-66-26-2
Parrizas Diaz N.
Radwanska U.
2-66-36-1
Stojanovic N.[7]
Diatchenko V.
6-756-16-3
Gasanova A.
Havlickova L.
6-24-66-4
Minnen G.[9]
Gatto Monticone G.
6-04-66-1
Wang X.
Kung L.
6-26-2
Smitkova T.
Inglis M.
6-26-2
Krejcikova B.[2]
Shinikova I.
6-26-3
Bonaventure Y.
Bains N.
6-36-2
Hruncakova V.
Barthel M.
2-66-46-3