Jason Kubler vs Sergiy Stakhovsky — Nur-Sultan 3 CH Round of 16

Nur-Sultan 3 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
AUS
Jason Kubler
#468ATP
1685ELO
1635Hard ELO
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 12 July 2021
hard
UKR6
Sergiy Stakhovsky
40 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWWLLW
Kubler J.
6-2 3-6 6-2
Stakhovsky S.
Kubler J.
6362
Stakhovsky S.
2621

Jason Kubler defeated Sergiy Stakhovsky 6-2 3-6 6-2 in the Nur-Sultan 3 CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Sergiy Stakhovsky came in leading the head-to-head 1–0, but Jason Kubler had been the form player, winning 7 of their last 9 on hard. Jason Kubler claimed a first win over Sergiy Stakhovsky in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Jason Kubler closed it out in three sets, 6–2 3–6 6–2.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-01-10Doha Aus Open QualiesQ2hardSergiy Stakhovsky7-6(4) 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Kubler J.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Stakhovsky S.

Stakhovsky S.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Kubler J.

Serve advantage — Kubler J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kubler J.Stakhovsky S.
1st serve in·Even
62%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
48%
Service points won·Even
64%
63%
Return points won·Even
38%
36%
Break points saved·Even
61%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.7
6.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.3
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (172 vs 47). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kubler J.Stakhovsky S.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
59
40
Break points saved·Even
90
88
Break points won·Dominant
46
3
Deciding sets·Clear edge
79
57
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
37
59

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kubler J.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Stakhovsky S.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
0.0
H2H
10.0
4.5
Surface form
6.6
0.0
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
3.3
3-set count
4.0
Prev. match
9.0
Surface transition
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Purcell M.[4]
Clarke J.[3]
3-66-47-66
Semi-finals
Clarke J.[3]
Gojo B.[5]
6-46-4
Purcell M.[4]
Polansky P.[7]
7-53-67-63
Quarter-finals
Gojo B.[5]
Basic M.
2-67-626-2
Clarke J.[3]
Kubler J.
3-67-57-61
Purcell M.[4]
Hsu Y.
6-26-1
Polansky P.[7]
Safiullin R.[1]
6-21-67-64
R16
Basic M.
Peniston R.
6-36-1
Gojo B.[5]
Tseng C.
6-16-2
Clarke J.[3]
Zhukayev B.
6-36-3
Kubler J.
Stakhovsky S.[6]
6-23-66-2
Hsu Y.
Karlovskiy E.
6-36-0
Purcell M.[4]
Wu T.
3-67-646-2
Polansky P.[7]
Kuznetsov A.
6-46-3
Safiullin R.[1]
Chung Y.
6-36-4
R32
Peniston R.
Istomin D.[2]
6-13-66-3
Basic M.
Yevseyev D.
6-36-3
Tseng C.
Denolly C.
6-23-66-3
Gojo B.[5]
Sultanov K.
7-636-1
Clarke J.[3]
Dubrivnyy A.
7-57-63
Zhukayev B.
Chappell N.
4-66-37-66
Stakhovsky S.[6]
Kotov P.
7-56-2
Hsu Y.
Grenier H.[8]
6-46-2
Karlovskiy E.
Catarina L.
6-46-2
Wu T.
Krutykh O.
6-36-4
Purcell M.[4]
Bega A.
2-66-27-5
Polansky P.[7]
Lomakin G.
6-47-64
Kuznetsov A.
Santillan A.
6-46-3
Chung Y.
Bondarevskiy Y.
6-36-4
Safiullin R.[1]
Jaziri M.
6-46-2
Kubler J.
Tashbulatov D.
6-16-3