Lukas Rosol vs Vit Kopriva — Amersfoort CH Round of 32

Amersfoort CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
CZE8
Lukas Rosol
40 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 July 2021
clay
Vit Kopriva
CZE
Vit Kopriva
#64ATP
1740ELO
1699Clay ELO
$805kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
29 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWLWL
Rosol L.
7-6 6-2
Kopriva V.
Rosol L.
7762
Kopriva V.
6420

Lukas Rosol defeated Vit Kopriva 7-6 6-2 in the Amersfoort CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Lukas Rosol closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Rosol L.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Kopriva V.

Kopriva V.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Rosol L.

Serve advantage — Kopriva V.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Rosol L.Kopriva V.
—
Serve
20
—
Return
56

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Rosol L.Kopriva V.
1st serve in·Even
61%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
48%
Service points won·Even
62%
60%
Return points won·Even
37%
41%
Break points saved·Even
60%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.6
3.2
Double faults / match·Even
3.3
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (113 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Rosol L.Kopriva V.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
51
72
Break points saved·Slight edge
89
83
Break points won·Dominant
3
66
Deciding sets·Clear edge
77
90
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
72
61

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Rosol L.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Kopriva V.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
1.0
Surface form
6.3
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.7
Minutes 14d
6.1
3-set count
4.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Rosol L.Kopriva V.
Freshness·
—
97

Kopriva V.: 12 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Griekspoor T.[1]
Van De Zandschulp B.[2]
6-13-66-1
Semi-finals
Van De Zandschulp B.[2]
Andreozzi G.[7]
6-746-36-2
Griekspoor T.[1]
Hoang A.[4]
4-66-36-4
Quarter-finals
Van De Zandschulp B.[2]
De Jong J.
6-36-0
Andreozzi G.[7]
Sels J.
3-66-46-2
Hoang A.[4]
Rosol L.[8]
6-47-64
Griekspoor T.[1]
Coppejans K.[6]
3-66-36-2
R16
Van De Zandschulp B.[2]
Moraing M.
6-37-5
De Jong J.
Safwat M.[5]
2-66-16-4
Sels J.
Vatutin A.
6-26-2
Andreozzi G.[7]
Vukic A.
7-52-66-3
Coppejans K.[6]
Brouwer G.
6-36-4
Griekspoor T.[1]
Vrbensky M.
6-46-4
Rosol L.[8]
Nikles J.
6-26-1
Hoang A.[4]
Mena F.
7-647-65
R32
Hoang A.[4]
Maden Y.
6-47-65
Brouwer G.
Jong S.
7-670-0
Moraing M.
Haerteis J.
6-16-0
Brouwer G.
Jong A.
7-670-0
Van De Zandschulp B.[2]
Oliveira G.
6-26-4
De Jong J.
Guinard M.
7-654-67-65
Safwat M.[5]
Elias G.
6-16-3
Sels J.
Aragone J.
6-16-1
Vukic A.
Haase R.
6-47-61
Andreozzi G.[7]
Lehecka J.
7-52-66-4
Rosol L.[8]
Kopriva V.
7-646-2
Mena F.
Bellucci T.
6-36-4
Coppejans K.[6]
Wassermann D.
6-35-76-2
Vrbensky M.
Bergs Z.
6-47-62
Nikles J.
Nijboer R.
7-656-2
Griekspoor T.[1]
Geerts M.
6-27-62
Vatutin A.
Polmans M.[3]
6-746-46-4