Mats Moraing vs Johannes Haerteis — Amersfoort CH Round of 32

Amersfoort CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
GER
Mats Moraing
34 yrs · 198 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 July 2021
clay
GER
Johannes Haerteis
30 yrs · 196 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLWWLL
Moraing M.
6-1 6-0
Haerteis J.
Moraing M.
662
Haerteis J.
100

Mats Moraing defeated Johannes Haerteis 6-1 6-0 in the Amersfoort CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Moraing M.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Haerteis J.

Haerteis J.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Moraing M.

Serve advantage — Moraing M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Moraing M.Haerteis J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
56%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
75%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
48%
Service points won·Even
63%
60%
Return points won·Even
37%
36%
Break points saved·Even
62%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.3
3.5
Double faults / match·Even
3.4
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (117 vs 51). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Moraing M.Haerteis J.
Clutch Rating·Even
40
38
Break points saved·Clear edge
86
71
Break points won·Slight edge
18
12
Deciding sets·Slight edge
66
76
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
18
25

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Moraing M.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Haerteis J.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.1
Surface form
2.8
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.1
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Griekspoor T.[1]
Van De Zandschulp B.[2]
6-13-66-1
Semi-finals
Van De Zandschulp B.[2]
Andreozzi G.[7]
6-746-36-2
Griekspoor T.[1]
Hoang A.[4]
4-66-36-4
Quarter-finals
Van De Zandschulp B.[2]
De Jong J.
6-36-0
Andreozzi G.[7]
Sels J.
3-66-46-2
Hoang A.[4]
Rosol L.[8]
6-47-64
Griekspoor T.[1]
Coppejans K.[6]
3-66-36-2
R16
Van De Zandschulp B.[2]
Moraing M.
6-37-5
De Jong J.
Safwat M.[5]
2-66-16-4
Sels J.
Vatutin A.
6-26-2
Andreozzi G.[7]
Vukic A.
7-52-66-3
Coppejans K.[6]
Brouwer G.
6-36-4
Griekspoor T.[1]
Vrbensky M.
6-46-4
Rosol L.[8]
Nikles J.
6-26-1
Hoang A.[4]
Mena F.
7-647-65
R32
Hoang A.[4]
Maden Y.
6-47-65
Brouwer G.
Jong S.
7-670-0
Moraing M.
Haerteis J.
6-16-0
Brouwer G.
Jong A.
7-670-0
Van De Zandschulp B.[2]
Oliveira G.
6-26-4
De Jong J.
Guinard M.
7-654-67-65
Safwat M.[5]
Elias G.
6-16-3
Sels J.
Aragone J.
6-16-1
Vukic A.
Haase R.
6-47-61
Andreozzi G.[7]
Lehecka J.
7-52-66-4
Rosol L.[8]
Kopriva V.
7-646-2
Mena F.
Bellucci T.
6-36-4
Coppejans K.[6]
Wassermann D.
6-35-76-2
Vrbensky M.
Bergs Z.
6-47-62
Nikles J.
Nijboer R.
7-656-2
Griekspoor T.[1]
Geerts M.
6-27-62
Vatutin A.
Polmans M.[3]
6-746-46-4