Tallon Griekspoor vs Botic Van De ZandschulpAmersfoort CH Final

Amersfoort CH · CHALLENGER · Final
#58ATP
1789ELO
1726Clay ELO
$970kYTD
$8.1MCAREER
30 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 12 July 2021
clay
#54ATP
1743ELO
1690Clay ELO
$690kYTD
$6.6MCAREER
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLLW
Griekspoor T.
6-1 3-6 6-1
Van De Zandschulp B.
Griekspoor T.
6362
Van De Zandschulp B.
1611

Tallon Griekspoor defeated Botic Van De Zandschulp 6-1 3-6 6-1 in the Amersfoort CH final on clay. The result followed the form book — Tallon Griekspoor came in leading the head-to-head 3–1. Tallon Griekspoor extended the head-to-head to 4–1.

Key context

Head to head

31
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-06-10s HertogenboschR32grassTallon Griekspoor6-2 6.2-7.7 6-4
2025-01-27MontpellierR32hardTallon Griekspoor7-5 6-3
2023-01-16Australian OpenR64hardTallon Griekspoor6-4 6-4 6-4
2022-08-22Winston-SalemR32hardBotic Van De Zandschulp7-6(5) 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Griekspoor T.serving84% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Van De Zandschulp B.

Van De Zandschulp B.serving84% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Griekspoor T.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Griekspoor T.Van De Zandschulp B.
19
Serve
33
26
Return
74

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
64%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
75%
71%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
52%
47%
Service points won·Slight edge
67%
62%
Return points won·Slight edge
33%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.6
5.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.2
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Even
76
77
Break points saved·Even
99
98
Break points won·Dominant
34
68
Deciding sets·Clear edge
94
78
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
97
80

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
5.4+35 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.6Clay Elo 1690
5.7Overall Elo 1789
ELO gap
4.3Overall Elo 1743
5.0
H2H
5.0
7.1
Surface form
7.1
7.03-match win streak
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
5.0
Minutes 14d
3.3
0.0
3-set count
0.0
Prev. match
8.0
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Freshness·Slight edge
94
87

Griekspoor T.: 11 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Van De Zandschulp B.: 10 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast