Tallon Griekspoor vs Botic Van De Zandschulp — Amersfoort CH Final

Amersfoort CH · CHALLENGER · Final
NED
Tallon Griekspoor
[1]
#33ATP
1823ELO
1749Clay ELO
$831kYTD
$7.9MCAREER
29 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10
LLWWLLWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 12 July 2021
clay
NED
Botic Van De Zandschulp
[2]
#55ATP
1758ELO
1702Clay ELO
$537kYTD
$6.4MCAREER
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10
LLLWLWLWWW

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Griekspoor T.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Van De Zandschulp B.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
5.4+46 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.6Clay Elo 1702
5.7Overall Elo 1823
ELO gap
4.3Overall Elo 1758
5.0
H2H
5.0
7.1
Surface form
7.1
7.03-match win streak
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
5.0
Minutes 14d
3.3
0.0
3-set count
0.0
Prev. match
8.0
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Griekspoor T.
6362
Van De Zandschulp B.
1611

Head to head

2–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-01-27MontpellierR32hardTallon Griekspoor7-5 6-3
2023-01-16Australian OpenR64hardTallon Griekspoor6-4 6-4 6-4
2022-08-22Winston-SalemR32hardBotic Van De Zandschulp7-6(5) 6-3
2019-10-21Hamburg CHR32hardBotic Van De Zandschulp6-0 0-0 RET

Statistics

Recent form
Griekspoor T.Van De Zandschulp B.
64%1st serve in+1%63%
73%1st serve points won+1%74%
51%2nd serve points won+4%47%
65%Service points won+1%64%
31%Return points won+7%38%
60%Break points saved60%
7.4Aces / match+0.66.8
2.9Double faults / match+1.74.6

Averages from each player's recent completed matches (19 vs 20). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Draw

Final
Griekspoor T.[1]
Van De Zandschulp B.[2]
6-13-66-1
Semi-finals
Griekspoor T.[1]
Hoang A.[4]
4-66-36-4
Van De Zandschulp B.[2]
Andreozzi G.[7]
6-746-36-2
Quarter-finals
Van De Zandschulp B.[2]
De Jong J.
6-36-0
Griekspoor T.[1]
Coppejans K.[6]
3-66-36-2
Andreozzi G.[7]
Sels J.
3-66-46-2
Hoang A.[4]
Rosol L.[8]
6-47-64
R16
Van De Zandschulp B.[2]
Moraing M.
6-37-5
Rosol L.[8]
Nikles J.
6-26-1
Griekspoor T.[1]
Vrbensky M.
6-46-4
De Jong J.
Safwat M.[5]
2-66-16-4
Sels J.
Vatutin A.
6-26-2
Coppejans K.[6]
Brouwer G.
6-36-4
Hoang A.[4]
Mena F.
7-647-65
Andreozzi G.[7]
Vukic A.
7-52-66-3
R32
Hoang A.[4]
Maden Y.
6-47-65
Nikles J.
Nijboer R.
7-656-2
Brouwer G.
Jong S.
7-670-0
Griekspoor T.[1]
Geerts M.
6-27-62
Sels J.
Aragone J.
6-16-1
Moraing M.
Haerteis J.
6-16-0
Rosol L.[8]
Kopriva V.
7-646-2
Coppejans K.[6]
Wassermann D.
6-35-76-2
Mena F.
Bellucci T.
6-36-4
Vrbensky M.
Bergs Z.
6-47-62
Safwat M.[5]
Elias G.
6-16-3
Vatutin A.
Polmans M.[3]
6-746-46-4
Andreozzi G.[7]
Lehecka J.
7-52-66-4
De Jong J.
Guinard M.
7-654-67-65
Vukic A.
Haase R.
6-47-61
Van De Zandschulp B.[2]
Oliveira G.
6-26-4