Borna Gojo vs Chun Hsin Tseng — Nur-Sultan 3 CH Round of 16

Nur-Sultan 3 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Borna Gojo
CRO5
Borna Gojo
#168ATP
1683ELO
1662Hard ELO
$139kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
28 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 July 2021
hard
Chun Hsin Tseng
TPE
Chun Hsin Tseng
#234ATP
1554ELO
1495Hard ELO
$99kYTD
$1.7MCAREER
24 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLWLW
Gojo B.
6-1 6-2
Tseng C.
Gojo B.
662
Tseng C.
120

Borna Gojo defeated Chun Hsin Tseng 6-1 6-2 in the Nur-Sultan 3 CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gojo B.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Tseng C.

Tseng C.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Gojo B.

Serve advantage — Gojo B.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gojo B.Tseng C.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
76%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
67%
61%
Return points won·Even
36%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
10.6
3.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.8
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gojo B.Tseng C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
53
26
Break points saved·Clear edge
95
83
Break points won·Slight edge
10
15
Deciding sets·Dominant
70
31
Tiebreaks·Dominant
73
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gojo B.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Tseng C.
4.4
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
7.2+167 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.8Hard Elo 1495
6.9Overall Elo 1683
ELO gap
3.1Overall Elo 1554
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.6
Surface form
2.8
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.3
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
7.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Gojo B.Tseng C.
Freshness·
100
—

Gojo B.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Purcell M.[4]
Clarke J.[3]
3-66-47-66
Semi-finals
Clarke J.[3]
Gojo B.[5]
6-46-4
Purcell M.[4]
Polansky P.[7]
7-53-67-63
Quarter-finals
Gojo B.[5]
Basic M.
2-67-626-2
Clarke J.[3]
Kubler J.
3-67-57-61
Purcell M.[4]
Hsu Y.
6-26-1
Polansky P.[7]
Safiullin R.[1]
6-21-67-64
R16
Basic M.
Peniston R.
6-36-1
Gojo B.[5]
Tseng C.
6-16-2
Clarke J.[3]
Zhukayev B.
6-36-3
Kubler J.
Stakhovsky S.[6]
6-23-66-2
Hsu Y.
Karlovskiy E.
6-36-0
Purcell M.[4]
Wu T.
3-67-646-2
Polansky P.[7]
Kuznetsov A.
6-46-3
Safiullin R.[1]
Chung Y.
6-36-4
R32
Peniston R.
Istomin D.[2]
6-13-66-3
Basic M.
Yevseyev D.
6-36-3
Tseng C.
Denolly C.
6-23-66-3
Gojo B.[5]
Sultanov K.
7-636-1
Clarke J.[3]
Dubrivnyy A.
7-57-63
Zhukayev B.
Chappell N.
4-66-37-66
Stakhovsky S.[6]
Kotov P.
7-56-2
Hsu Y.
Grenier H.[8]
6-46-2
Karlovskiy E.
Catarina L.
6-46-2
Wu T.
Krutykh O.
6-36-4
Purcell M.[4]
Bega A.
2-66-27-5
Polansky P.[7]
Lomakin G.
6-47-64
Kuznetsov A.
Santillan A.
6-46-3
Chung Y.
Bondarevskiy Y.
6-36-4
Safiullin R.[1]
Jaziri M.
6-46-2
Kubler J.
Tashbulatov D.
6-16-3