Borna Gojo vs Khumoun Sultanov — Nur-Sultan 3 CH Round of 32

Nur-Sultan 3 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Borna Gojo
CRO5
Borna Gojo
#168ATP
1683ELO
1662Hard ELO
$139kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
28 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 July 2021
hard
UZB
Khumoun Sultanov
1379ELO
1367Hard ELO
27 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWWLLLL
Gojo B.
7-6 6-1
Sultanov K.
Gojo B.
7762
Sultanov K.
6310

Borna Gojo defeated Khumoun Sultanov 7-6 6-1 in the Nur-Sultan 3 CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Borna Gojo came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–6 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gojo B.serving87% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Sultanov K.

Sultanov K.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Gojo B.

Serve advantage — Gojo B.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gojo B.Sultanov K.
1st serve in·Even
64%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
76%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
67%
60%
Return points won·Even
36%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
56%
Aces / match·Dominant
10.6
4.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.8
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 86). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gojo B.Sultanov K.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
53
7
Break points saved·Dominant
95
44
Break points won·Even
10
14
Deciding sets·Dominant
70
18
Tiebreaks·Dominant
73
35

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gojo B.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Sultanov K.
4.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
8.7+295 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.3Hard Elo 1367
8.8Overall Elo 1683
ELO gap
1.2Overall Elo 1379
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.6
Surface form
4.5
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.3
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Gojo B.Sultanov K.
Freshness·
100
—

Gojo B.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Purcell M.[4]
Clarke J.[3]
3-66-47-66
Semi-finals
Clarke J.[3]
Gojo B.[5]
6-46-4
Purcell M.[4]
Polansky P.[7]
7-53-67-63
Quarter-finals
Gojo B.[5]
Basic M.
2-67-626-2
Clarke J.[3]
Kubler J.
3-67-57-61
Purcell M.[4]
Hsu Y.
6-26-1
Polansky P.[7]
Safiullin R.[1]
6-21-67-64
R16
Basic M.
Peniston R.
6-36-1
Gojo B.[5]
Tseng C.
6-16-2
Clarke J.[3]
Zhukayev B.
6-36-3
Kubler J.
Stakhovsky S.[6]
6-23-66-2
Hsu Y.
Karlovskiy E.
6-36-0
Purcell M.[4]
Wu T.
3-67-646-2
Polansky P.[7]
Kuznetsov A.
6-46-3
Safiullin R.[1]
Chung Y.
6-36-4
R32
Peniston R.
Istomin D.[2]
6-13-66-3
Basic M.
Yevseyev D.
6-36-3
Tseng C.
Denolly C.
6-23-66-3
Gojo B.[5]
Sultanov K.
7-636-1
Clarke J.[3]
Dubrivnyy A.
7-57-63
Zhukayev B.
Chappell N.
4-66-37-66
Stakhovsky S.[6]
Kotov P.
7-56-2
Hsu Y.
Grenier H.[8]
6-46-2
Karlovskiy E.
Catarina L.
6-46-2
Wu T.
Krutykh O.
6-36-4
Purcell M.[4]
Bega A.
2-66-27-5
Polansky P.[7]
Lomakin G.
6-47-64
Kuznetsov A.
Santillan A.
6-46-3
Chung Y.
Bondarevskiy Y.
6-36-4
Safiullin R.[1]
Jaziri M.
6-46-2
Kubler J.
Tashbulatov D.
6-16-3