Zarina Diyas vs Camila Giorgi — Lausanne Round of 16

Lausanne · WTA · Round of 16
KAZ
Zarina Diyas
#585WTA
1533ELO
1481Clay ELO
32 yrs · 172 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 July 2021
clay
ITA4
Camila Giorgi
34 yrs · 168 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLWL
Diyas Z.
6-4 6-4
Giorgi C.
Diyas Z.
662
Giorgi C.
440

Zarina Diyas defeated Camila Giorgi 6-4 6-4 in the Lausanne round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Camila Giorgi came in leading the head-to-head 2–0. Zarina Diyas claimed a first win over Camila Giorgi in three meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Zarina Diyas edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

0–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2019-07-29WashingtonQFhardCamila Giorgi6-3 6-2
2016-01-11HobartR32hardCamila Giorgi6-4 1-6 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Diyas Z.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Giorgi C.

Giorgi C.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Diyas Z.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Diyas Z.Giorgi C.
1st serve in·Clear edge
70%
55%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
60%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
46%
Service points won·Even
56%
57%
Return points won·Even
45%
44%
Break points saved·Even
54%
54%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.3
3.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.3
6.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (94 vs 116). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Diyas Z.Giorgi C.
Clutch Rating·Even
52
54
Break points saved·Clear edge
49
71
Break points won·Even
78
81
Deciding sets·Clear edge
67
45
Tiebreaks·Even
81
83

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Diyas Z.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Giorgi C.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
2.9
Surface form
4.0
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.3
Minutes 14d
8.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Zidansek T.[1]
Burel C.
4-67-656-1
Semi-finals
Zidansek T.[1]
Zanevska M.
7-56-3
Burel C.
Garcia C.[5]
5-76-26-2
Quarter-finals
Burel C.
Ferro F.[2]
7-56-2
Zanevska M.
Vikhlyantseva N.
7-56-4
Zidansek T.[1]
Bronzetti L.
6-44-66-3
Garcia C.[5]
Diyas Z.
7-56-2
R16
Garcia C.[5]
Sharma A.
7-633-66-3
Bronzetti L.
Blinkova A.[8]
6-16-2
Zanevska M.
Voegele S.
7-56-3
Diyas Z.
Giorgi C.[4]
6-46-4
Burel C.
Rakhimova K.
1-66-36-3
Ferro F.[2]
Parks A.
6-41-66-0
Zidansek T.[1]
Minella M.
6-27-5
Vikhlyantseva N.
Paolini J.[7]
6-16-3
R32
Blinkova A.[8]
Govortsova O.
2-66-46-2
Garcia C.[5]
Dulgheru A.
6-26-2
Sharma A.
Pliskova K.
2-67-646-1
Diyas Z.
Waltert S.
6-46-4
Giorgi C.[4]
Eikeri U.
6-26-0
Rakhimova K.
Rus A.[6]
7-665-77-5
Burel C.
Bandecchi S.
6-06-2
Paolini J.[7]
Grammatikopoulou V.
6-34-67-5
Vikhlyantseva N.
Zavatska K.
4-66-46-0
Zidansek T.[1]
Melnikova M.
2-66-36-2
Bronzetti L.
Sugnaux T.
6-16-0
Zanevska M.
Teichmann J.[3]
6-32-66-2
Parks A.
Friedsam A.
6-33-66-4
Ferro F.[2]
Tan H.
7-56-2
Voegele S.
Di Lorenzo F.
3-66-26-2
Minella M.
Gracheva V.
6-36-2