Jay Clarke vs Beibit Zhukayev — Nur-Sultan 3 CH Round of 16

Nur-Sultan 3 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
GBR3
Jay Clarke
#239ATP
1458ELO
1421Hard ELO
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 July 2021
hard
KAZ
Beibit Zhukayev
#387ATP
1455ELO
1402Hard ELO
25 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLWWL
Clarke J.
6-3 6-3
Zhukayev B.
Clarke J.
662
Zhukayev B.
330

Jay Clarke defeated Beibit Zhukayev 6-3 6-3 in the Nur-Sultan 3 CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Clarke J.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Zhukayev B.

Zhukayev B.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Clarke J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Clarke J.Zhukayev B.
1st serve in·Even
57%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
77%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
60%
66%
Return points won·Slight edge
39%
33%
Break points saved·Slight edge
58%
66%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.7
10.9
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.9
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clarke J.Zhukayev B.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
8
31
Break points saved·Dominant
63
94
Break points won·Clear edge
21
1
Deciding sets·Clear edge
10
25
Tiebreaks·Dominant
4
63

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Clarke J.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Zhukayev B.
4.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
5.1+19 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.9Hard Elo 1402
4.7Overall Elo 1458
ELO gap
5.3Overall Elo 1455
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.5
Surface form
2.0
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0Lost last 7
Fatigue & Travel
8.3
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
8.0
7.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Purcell M.[4]
Clarke J.[3]
3-66-47-66
Semi-finals
Clarke J.[3]
Gojo B.[5]
6-46-4
Purcell M.[4]
Polansky P.[7]
7-53-67-63
Quarter-finals
Gojo B.[5]
Basic M.
2-67-626-2
Clarke J.[3]
Kubler J.
3-67-57-61
Purcell M.[4]
Hsu Y.
6-26-1
Polansky P.[7]
Safiullin R.[1]
6-21-67-64
R16
Basic M.
Peniston R.
6-36-1
Gojo B.[5]
Tseng C.
6-16-2
Clarke J.[3]
Zhukayev B.
6-36-3
Kubler J.
Stakhovsky S.[6]
6-23-66-2
Hsu Y.
Karlovskiy E.
6-36-0
Purcell M.[4]
Wu T.
3-67-646-2
Polansky P.[7]
Kuznetsov A.
6-46-3
Safiullin R.[1]
Chung Y.
6-36-4
R32
Peniston R.
Istomin D.[2]
6-13-66-3
Basic M.
Yevseyev D.
6-36-3
Tseng C.
Denolly C.
6-23-66-3
Gojo B.[5]
Sultanov K.
7-636-1
Clarke J.[3]
Dubrivnyy A.
7-57-63
Zhukayev B.
Chappell N.
4-66-37-66
Stakhovsky S.[6]
Kotov P.
7-56-2
Hsu Y.
Grenier H.[8]
6-46-2
Karlovskiy E.
Catarina L.
6-46-2
Wu T.
Krutykh O.
6-36-4
Purcell M.[4]
Bega A.
2-66-27-5
Polansky P.[7]
Lomakin G.
6-47-64
Kuznetsov A.
Santillan A.
6-46-3
Chung Y.
Bondarevskiy Y.
6-36-4
Safiullin R.[1]
Jaziri M.
6-46-2
Kubler J.
Tashbulatov D.
6-16-3