Beibit Zhukayev vs Nick Chappell — Nur-Sultan 3 CH Round of 32

Nur-Sultan 3 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
KAZ
Beibit Zhukayev
#387ATP
1455ELO
1402Hard ELO
25 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 12 July 2021
hard
USA
Nick Chappell
#1489ATP
33 yrs · 178 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLLWL
Zhukayev B.
4-6 6-3 7-6
Chappell N.
Zhukayev B.
46782
Chappell N.
63661

Beibit Zhukayev defeated Nick Chappell 4-6 6-3 7-6 in the Nur-Sultan 3 CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Zhukayev B.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Chappell N.

Chappell N.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Zhukayev B.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Zhukayev B.Chappell N.
1st serve in·Even
61%
61%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
77%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
59%
Return points won·Slight edge
33%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
56%
Aces / match·Dominant
10.9
3.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.6
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 148). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Zhukayev B.Chappell N.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
31
0
Break points saved·Dominant
94
29
Break points won·Slight edge
1
8
Deciding sets·Clear edge
25
3
Tiebreaks·Dominant
63
13

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Zhukayev B.
4.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Chappell N.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.0
Surface form
2.0
0.0Lost last 7
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
6.0
Surface transition
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Purcell M.[4]
Clarke J.[3]
3-66-47-66
Semi-finals
Clarke J.[3]
Gojo B.[5]
6-46-4
Purcell M.[4]
Polansky P.[7]
7-53-67-63
Quarter-finals
Gojo B.[5]
Basic M.
2-67-626-2
Clarke J.[3]
Kubler J.
3-67-57-61
Purcell M.[4]
Hsu Y.
6-26-1
Polansky P.[7]
Safiullin R.[1]
6-21-67-64
R16
Basic M.
Peniston R.
6-36-1
Gojo B.[5]
Tseng C.
6-16-2
Clarke J.[3]
Zhukayev B.
6-36-3
Kubler J.
Stakhovsky S.[6]
6-23-66-2
Hsu Y.
Karlovskiy E.
6-36-0
Purcell M.[4]
Wu T.
3-67-646-2
Polansky P.[7]
Kuznetsov A.
6-46-3
Safiullin R.[1]
Chung Y.
6-36-4
R32
Peniston R.
Istomin D.[2]
6-13-66-3
Basic M.
Yevseyev D.
6-36-3
Tseng C.
Denolly C.
6-23-66-3
Gojo B.[5]
Sultanov K.
7-636-1
Clarke J.[3]
Dubrivnyy A.
7-57-63
Zhukayev B.
Chappell N.
4-66-37-66
Stakhovsky S.[6]
Kotov P.
7-56-2
Hsu Y.
Grenier H.[8]
6-46-2
Karlovskiy E.
Catarina L.
6-46-2
Wu T.
Krutykh O.
6-36-4
Purcell M.[4]
Bega A.
2-66-27-5
Polansky P.[7]
Lomakin G.
6-47-64
Kuznetsov A.
Santillan A.
6-46-3
Chung Y.
Bondarevskiy Y.
6-36-4
Safiullin R.[1]
Jaziri M.
6-46-2
Kubler J.
Tashbulatov D.
6-16-3