Kimmer Coppejans vs Gijs Brouwer — Amersfoort CH Round of 16

Amersfoort CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Kimmer Coppejans
BEL6
Kimmer Coppejans
#199ATP
1544ELO
1513Clay ELO
32 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 July 2021
clay
Gijs Brouwer
NED
Gijs Brouwer
#1115ATP
30 yrs · 191 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLL
Coppejans K.
6-3 6-4
Brouwer G.
Coppejans K.
662
Brouwer G.
340

Kimmer Coppejans defeated Gijs Brouwer 6-3 6-4 in the Amersfoort CH round of 16 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Coppejans K.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Brouwer G.

Brouwer G.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Coppejans K.

Serve advantage — Coppejans K.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Coppejans K.Brouwer G.
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
67%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Even
61%
64%
Return points won·Slight edge
42%
37%
Break points saved·Even
59%
63%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.8
4.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.7
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Coppejans K.Brouwer G.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
44
19
Break points saved·Dominant
67
92
Break points won·Clear edge
29
6
Deciding sets·Dominant
74
22
Tiebreaks·Dominant
43
3

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Coppejans K.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Brouwer G.
3.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 609 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.0
Surface form
2.7
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.9
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Coppejans K.Brouwer G.
Freshness·Clear edge
76
92

Coppejans K.: 3 days rest · 4 matches, 73 games (7d) · Brouwer G.: 2 days rest · 1 match, 15 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Griekspoor T.[1]
Van De Zandschulp B.[2]
6-13-66-1
Semi-finals
Van De Zandschulp B.[2]
Andreozzi G.[7]
6-746-36-2
Griekspoor T.[1]
Hoang A.[4]
4-66-36-4
Quarter-finals
Van De Zandschulp B.[2]
De Jong J.
6-36-0
Andreozzi G.[7]
Sels J.
3-66-46-2
Hoang A.[4]
Rosol L.[8]
6-47-64
Griekspoor T.[1]
Coppejans K.[6]
3-66-36-2
R16
Van De Zandschulp B.[2]
Moraing M.
6-37-5
De Jong J.
Safwat M.[5]
2-66-16-4
Sels J.
Vatutin A.
6-26-2
Andreozzi G.[7]
Vukic A.
7-52-66-3
Coppejans K.[6]
Brouwer G.
6-36-4
Griekspoor T.[1]
Vrbensky M.
6-46-4
Rosol L.[8]
Nikles J.
6-26-1
Hoang A.[4]
Mena F.
7-647-65
R32
Hoang A.[4]
Maden Y.
6-47-65
Brouwer G.
Jong S.
7-670-0
Moraing M.
Haerteis J.
6-16-0
Brouwer G.
Jong A.
7-670-0
Van De Zandschulp B.[2]
Oliveira G.
6-26-4
De Jong J.
Guinard M.
7-654-67-65
Safwat M.[5]
Elias G.
6-16-3
Sels J.
Aragone J.
6-16-1
Vukic A.
Haase R.
6-47-61
Andreozzi G.[7]
Lehecka J.
7-52-66-4
Rosol L.[8]
Kopriva V.
7-646-2
Mena F.
Bellucci T.
6-36-4
Coppejans K.[6]
Wassermann D.
6-35-76-2
Vrbensky M.
Bergs Z.
6-47-62
Nikles J.
Nijboer R.
7-656-2
Griekspoor T.[1]
Geerts M.
6-27-62
Vatutin A.
Polmans M.[3]
6-746-46-4