Michael Vrbensky vs Zizou Bergs — Amersfoort CH Round of 32

Amersfoort CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Michael Vrbensky
CZE
Michael Vrbensky
#662ATP
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 July 2021
clay
Zizou Bergs
BEL
Zizou Bergs
#37ATP
1808ELO
1696Clay ELO
$995kYTD
$4.0MCAREER
27 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWLL
Vrbensky M.
6-4 7-6
Bergs Z.
Vrbensky M.
6772
Bergs Z.
4620

Michael Vrbensky defeated Zizou Bergs 6-4 7-6 in the Amersfoort CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Zizou Bergs came in ranked #37.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Vrbensky M.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Bergs Z.

Bergs Z.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Vrbensky M.

Serve advantage — Bergs Z.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Vrbensky M.Bergs Z.
1st serve in·Slight edge
56%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
67%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
59%
65%
Return points won·Even
39%
38%
Break points saved·Even
59%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.3
6.6
Double faults / match·Even
3.6
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (183 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Vrbensky M.Bergs Z.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
11
69
Break points saved·Dominant
52
95
Break points won·Slight edge
11
21
Deciding sets·Dominant
24
92
Tiebreaks·Dominant
31
91

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Vrbensky M.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Bergs Z.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.6
Surface form
7.5
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
6.5
3-set count
4.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Vrbensky M.Bergs Z.
Freshness·Clear edge
97
74

Vrbensky M.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Bergs Z.: 8 days rest · 4 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Griekspoor T.[1]
Van De Zandschulp B.[2]
6-13-66-1
Semi-finals
Van De Zandschulp B.[2]
Andreozzi G.[7]
6-746-36-2
Griekspoor T.[1]
Hoang A.[4]
4-66-36-4
Quarter-finals
Van De Zandschulp B.[2]
De Jong J.
6-36-0
Andreozzi G.[7]
Sels J.
3-66-46-2
Hoang A.[4]
Rosol L.[8]
6-47-64
Griekspoor T.[1]
Coppejans K.[6]
3-66-36-2
R16
Van De Zandschulp B.[2]
Moraing M.
6-37-5
De Jong J.
Safwat M.[5]
2-66-16-4
Sels J.
Vatutin A.
6-26-2
Andreozzi G.[7]
Vukic A.
7-52-66-3
Coppejans K.[6]
Brouwer G.
6-36-4
Griekspoor T.[1]
Vrbensky M.
6-46-4
Rosol L.[8]
Nikles J.
6-26-1
Hoang A.[4]
Mena F.
7-647-65
R32
Hoang A.[4]
Maden Y.
6-47-65
Brouwer G.
Jong S.
7-670-0
Moraing M.
Haerteis J.
6-16-0
Brouwer G.
Jong A.
7-670-0
Van De Zandschulp B.[2]
Oliveira G.
6-26-4
De Jong J.
Guinard M.
7-654-67-65
Safwat M.[5]
Elias G.
6-16-3
Sels J.
Aragone J.
6-16-1
Vukic A.
Haase R.
6-47-61
Andreozzi G.[7]
Lehecka J.
7-52-66-4
Rosol L.[8]
Kopriva V.
7-646-2
Mena F.
Bellucci T.
6-36-4
Coppejans K.[6]
Wassermann D.
6-35-76-2
Vrbensky M.
Bergs Z.
6-47-62
Nikles J.
Nijboer R.
7-656-2
Griekspoor T.[1]
Geerts M.
6-27-62
Vatutin A.
Polmans M.[3]
6-746-46-4