Mirza Basic vs Ryan Peniston — Nur-Sultan 3 CH Round of 16

Nur-Sultan 3 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Mirza Basic
BIH
Mirza Basic
#602ATP
35 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 July 2021
hard
Ryan Peniston
GBR
Ryan Peniston
#417ATP
1441ELO
1402Hard ELO
30 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWW
Basic M.
6-3 6-1
Peniston R.
Basic M.
662
Peniston R.
310

Mirza Basic defeated Ryan Peniston 6-3 6-1 in the Nur-Sultan 3 CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Basic M.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Peniston R.

Peniston R.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Basic M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Basic M.Peniston R.
1st serve in·Even
62%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
61%
Return points won·Even
38%
41%
Break points saved·Even
57%
57%
Aces / match·Even
3.3
2.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.6
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (164 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Basic M.Peniston R.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
33
20
Break points saved·Even
56
60
Break points won·Clear edge
4
25
Deciding sets·Dominant
66
36
Tiebreaks·Dominant
67
15

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Basic M.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Peniston R.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.1
Surface form
4.6
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.7
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
6.0
Surface transition
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Purcell M.[4]
Clarke J.[3]
3-66-47-66
Semi-finals
Clarke J.[3]
Gojo B.[5]
6-46-4
Purcell M.[4]
Polansky P.[7]
7-53-67-63
Quarter-finals
Gojo B.[5]
Basic M.
2-67-626-2
Clarke J.[3]
Kubler J.
3-67-57-61
Purcell M.[4]
Hsu Y.
6-26-1
Polansky P.[7]
Safiullin R.[1]
6-21-67-64
R16
Basic M.
Peniston R.
6-36-1
Gojo B.[5]
Tseng C.
6-16-2
Clarke J.[3]
Zhukayev B.
6-36-3
Kubler J.
Stakhovsky S.[6]
6-23-66-2
Hsu Y.
Karlovskiy E.
6-36-0
Purcell M.[4]
Wu T.
3-67-646-2
Polansky P.[7]
Kuznetsov A.
6-46-3
Safiullin R.[1]
Chung Y.
6-36-4
R32
Peniston R.
Istomin D.[2]
6-13-66-3
Basic M.
Yevseyev D.
6-36-3
Tseng C.
Denolly C.
6-23-66-3
Gojo B.[5]
Sultanov K.
7-636-1
Clarke J.[3]
Dubrivnyy A.
7-57-63
Zhukayev B.
Chappell N.
4-66-37-66
Stakhovsky S.[6]
Kotov P.
7-56-2
Hsu Y.
Grenier H.[8]
6-46-2
Karlovskiy E.
Catarina L.
6-46-2
Wu T.
Krutykh O.
6-36-4
Purcell M.[4]
Bega A.
2-66-27-5
Polansky P.[7]
Lomakin G.
6-47-64
Kuznetsov A.
Santillan A.
6-46-3
Chung Y.
Bondarevskiy Y.
6-36-4
Safiullin R.[1]
Jaziri M.
6-46-2
Kubler J.
Tashbulatov D.
6-16-3