Kevin Anderson vs Jack Sock — Newport Quarter-final

Newport · ATP · Quarter-final
RSA8
Kevin Anderson
40 yrs · 203 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 12 July 2021
grass
USA
Jack Sock
33 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLL
Anderson K.
6-7 6-2 6-4
Sock J.
Anderson K.
65662
Sock J.
77241

Kevin Anderson defeated Jack Sock 6-7 6-2 6-4 in the Newport quarter-final on grass. Kevin Anderson extended the head-to-head to 3–2.

Key context

Head to head

2–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2017-07-31WashingtonSFhardKevin Anderson6-3 6-4
2016-01-11AucklandQFhardJack Sock1-6 6-4 6-4
2015-08-16Cincinnati MastersR32hardKevin Anderson6-3 7-6(7)
2015-04-06HoustonSFclayJack Sock7-6(3) 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Anderson K.serving95% hold

wins 75% of points on serve vs Sock J.

Sock J.serving95% hold

wins 75% of points on serve vs Anderson K.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Anderson K.Sock J.
1st serve in·Even
64%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
79%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Even
69%
65%
Return points won·Even
32%
36%
Break points saved·Even
68%
64%
Aces / match·Dominant
15.6
6.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.9
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (54 vs 98). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Anderson K.Sock J.
Clutch Rating·Even
63
67
Break points saved·Even
98
96
Break points won·Clear edge
10
28
Deciding sets·Even
84
86
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
93
82

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Anderson K.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Sock J.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
4.6
Surface form
2.7
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.1
Minutes 14d
4.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Anderson K.[8]
Brooksby J.
7-686-4
Semi-finals
Brooksby J.
Thompson J.[7]
6-37-63
Anderson K.[8]
Bublik A.[1]
4-67-637-5
Quarter-finals
Bublik A.[1]
Jung J.
6-26-4
Thompson J.[7]
Cressy M.
6-37-66
Brooksby J.
Gojowczyk P.
6-06-3
Anderson K.[8]
Sock J.
6-756-26-4
R16
Gojowczyk P.
Pospisil V.[4]
6-36-3
Brooksby J.
Kudla D.
6-34-67-5
Cressy M.
Querrey S.[2]
6-42-66-2
Thompson J.[7]
Sugita Y.
6-06-2
Anderson K.[8]
Ofner S.
7-57-63
Sock J.
Nishioka Y.[3]
6-26-3
Jung J.
Sandgren T.[5]
6-26-2
Bublik A.[1]
Karlovic I.
7-654-66-1
R32
Thompson J.[7]
Stebe C.
5-4
Jung J.
Schnur B.
7-56-717-64
Brooksby J.
Donskoy E.
7-56-3
Kudla D.
Johnson S.[6]
7-633-66-4
Sugita Y.
Rodionov J.
7-56-3
Gojowczyk P.
Krueger M.
6-26-2
Anderson K.[8]
Marchenko I.
7-56-3
Ofner S.
Uchiyama Y.
6-46-4
Sock J.
Bolt A.
3-66-46-3
Sandgren T.[5]
Sousa J.
6-47-63
Karlovic I.
Zapata Miralles B.
6-756-16-4
Cressy M.
Lorenzi P.
6-16-2