Carlos Taberner vs Matteo Viola — Salzburg CH Round of 32

Salzburg CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Carlos Taberner
ESP8
Carlos Taberner
#197ATP
1610ELO
1605Clay ELO
$102kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
28 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLWWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 5 July 2021
clay
ITA
Matteo Viola
39 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLLL
Taberner C.
6-4 6-4
Viola M.
Taberner C.
662
Viola M.
440

Carlos Taberner defeated Matteo Viola 6-4 6-4 in the Salzburg CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Carlos Taberner edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Taberner C.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Viola M.

Viola M.serving52% hold

wins 51% of points on serve vs Taberner C.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Taberner C.Viola M.
1st serve in·Even
63%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
63%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
45%
Service points won·Even
59%
57%
Return points won·Even
43%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
58%
52%
Aces / match·Even
1.6
1.4
Double faults / match·Even
3.5
3.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 63). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Taberner C.Viola M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
53
8
Break points saved·Dominant
74
20
Break points won·Dominant
59
25
Deciding sets·Dominant
75
15
Tiebreaks·Dominant
22
70

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Taberner C.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Viola M.
4.1
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.7
Surface form
3.8
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.6
Minutes 14d
7.3
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
3.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Bagnis F.[4]
Coria F.[3]
6-43-66-2
Semi-finals
Coria F.[3]
Londero J.
6-16-4
Bagnis F.[4]
Jarry N.
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Londero J.
Cuevas P.[2]
6-36-0
Coria F.[3]
Rola B.
6-27-65
Bagnis F.[4]
Dzumhur D.
6-16-2
Jarry N.
Lehecka J.
7-666-4
R16
Cuevas P.[2]
Petrovic D.
6-16-4
Londero J.
Vatutin A.
6-02-66-0
Coria F.[3]
Huesler M.
6-14-66-4
Rola B.
Carballes Baena R.[5]
5-76-27-64
Dzumhur D.
Taberner C.[8]
7-626-756-2
Lehecka J.
Muller A.
6-26-4
Jarry N.
Heller P.
6-26-4
Bagnis F.[4]
Gaston H.
6-46-1
R32
Londero J.
Daniel T.[6]
6-46-4
Coria F.[3]
Melzer G.
6-36-4
Huesler M.
Rosol L.
6-36-4
Rola B.
Novak D.
7-57-64
Carballes Baena R.[5]
Neuchrist M.
6-44-66-4
Taberner C.[8]
Viola M.
6-46-4
Dzumhur D.
Mena F.
6-46-0
Gaston H.
Bachinger M.
6-46-3
Bagnis F.[4]
Seyboth Wild T.
6-36-2
Muller A.
Galan D.[7]
7-57-63
Lehecka J.
Aichhorn J.
6-46-3
Heller P.
Cerundolo F.
6-33-66-3
Petrovic D.
Gulbis E.
6-27-64
Vatutin A.
Erler A.
2-66-46-2
Cuevas P.[2]
Yevseyev D.
7-56-3
Jarry N.
Monteiro T.[1]
6-727-647-64