Blaz Rola vs Dennis Novak — Salzburg CH Round of 32

Salzburg CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
SLO
Blaz Rola
35 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 5 July 2021
clay
AUT
Dennis Novak
#818ATP
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLWLW
Rola B.
7-5 7-6
Novak D.
Rola B.
7772
Novak D.
5640

Blaz Rola defeated Dennis Novak 7-5 7-6 in the Salzburg CH round of 32 on clay. Blaz Rola extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2020-02-24DubaiQ1hardDennis Novak7-6(3) 6-7(3) 6-4
2019-05-27Roland GarrosQ1clayBlaz Rola6-2 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Rola B.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Novak D.

Novak D.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Rola B.

Serve advantage — Novak D.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Rola B.Novak D.
1st serve in·Even
62%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Even
61%
62%
Return points won·Even
39%
40%
Break points saved·Even
61%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.5
3.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.8
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (88 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Rola B.Novak D.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
17
36
Break points saved·Even
81
80
Break points won·Slight edge
5
15
Deciding sets·Dominant
6
33
Tiebreaks·Dominant
51
77

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Rola B.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Novak D.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
10.0
H2H
0.0
5.0
Surface form
4.6
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.2
Minutes 14d
8.8
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Bagnis F.[4]
Coria F.[3]
6-43-66-2
Semi-finals
Coria F.[3]
Londero J.
6-16-4
Bagnis F.[4]
Jarry N.
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Londero J.
Cuevas P.[2]
6-36-0
Coria F.[3]
Rola B.
6-27-65
Bagnis F.[4]
Dzumhur D.
6-16-2
Jarry N.
Lehecka J.
7-666-4
R16
Cuevas P.[2]
Petrovic D.
6-16-4
Londero J.
Vatutin A.
6-02-66-0
Coria F.[3]
Huesler M.
6-14-66-4
Rola B.
Carballes Baena R.[5]
5-76-27-64
Dzumhur D.
Taberner C.[8]
7-626-756-2
Lehecka J.
Muller A.
6-26-4
Jarry N.
Heller P.
6-26-4
Bagnis F.[4]
Gaston H.
6-46-1
R32
Londero J.
Daniel T.[6]
6-46-4
Coria F.[3]
Melzer G.
6-36-4
Huesler M.
Rosol L.
6-36-4
Rola B.
Novak D.
7-57-64
Carballes Baena R.[5]
Neuchrist M.
6-44-66-4
Taberner C.[8]
Viola M.
6-46-4
Dzumhur D.
Mena F.
6-46-0
Gaston H.
Bachinger M.
6-46-3
Bagnis F.[4]
Seyboth Wild T.
6-36-2
Muller A.
Galan D.[7]
7-57-63
Lehecka J.
Aichhorn J.
6-46-3
Heller P.
Cerundolo F.
6-33-66-3
Petrovic D.
Gulbis E.
6-27-64
Vatutin A.
Erler A.
2-66-46-2
Cuevas P.[2]
Yevseyev D.
7-56-3
Jarry N.
Monteiro T.[1]
6-727-647-64