Marvin Moeller vs Sumit Nagal — Braunschweig CH Round of 16

Braunschweig CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Marvin Moeller
GER
Marvin Moeller
#314ATP
1396ELO
1383Clay ELO
27 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 5 July 2021
clay
Sumit Nagal
IND7
Sumit Nagal
#241ATP
1543ELO
1538Clay ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLLLL
Moeller M.
6-3 1-6 6-2
Nagal S.
Moeller M.
6162
Nagal S.
3621

Marvin Moeller defeated Sumit Nagal 6-3 1-6 6-2 in the Braunschweig CH round of 16 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Marvin Moeller closed it out in three sets, 6–3 1–6 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Moeller M.serving59% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Nagal S.

Nagal S.serving61% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Moeller M.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Moeller M.Nagal S.
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
70%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
51%
Service points won·Even
59%
60%
Return points won·Even
42%
42%
Break points saved·Even
57%
58%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.3
1.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.3
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (92 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Moeller M.Nagal S.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
48
33
Break points saved·Dominant
43
69
Break points won·Slight edge
44
35
Deciding sets·Dominant
73
16
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
91
84

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Moeller M.
4.2
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 245 days (−1.5)
Nagal S.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.4
Surface form
4.6
7.03-match win streak
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Prev. match
4.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Moeller M.Nagal S.
Freshness·Dominant
70
96

Moeller M.: 4 days rest · 3 matches, 60 games (7d) · Nagal S.: 8 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Altmaier D.[8]
Laaksonen H.[5]
6-16-2
Semi-finals
Altmaier D.[8]
Moeller M.
7-56-0
Laaksonen H.[5]
Kopriva V.
6-46-0
Quarter-finals
Moeller M.
Hassan B.
6-46-2
Altmaier D.[8]
Ymer E.
6-36-3
Laaksonen H.[5]
Kovalik J.[4]
6-36-2
Kopriva V.
Bergs Z.
3-66-07-5
R16
Hassan B.
Ehrat S.
4-66-36-4
Moeller M.
Nagal S.[7]
6-31-66-2
Ymer E.
Hanfmann Y.[3]
2-66-36-2
Altmaier D.[8]
Vilella Martinez M.
6-36-2
Kovalik J.[4]
Jaziri M.
6-17-5
Bergs Z.
Machac T.[6]
7-655-76-4
Kopriva V.
Paire B.[1]
6-12-66-2
Laaksonen H.[5]
Kuhn N.
6-47-5
R32
Hassan B.
Kelly D.
6-47-67
Moeller M.
Gabashvili T.
7-56-3
Nagal S.[7]
Safwat M.
6-37-63
Hanfmann Y.[3]
Diez S.
7-52-66-3
Ymer E.
Kamke T.
6-37-5
Vilella Martinez M.
Molleker R.
3-66-46-3
Altmaier D.[8]
Kolar Z.
6-27-5
Laaksonen H.[5]
Rosenkranz M.
6-36-2
Kuhn N.
Zverev M.
6-27-64
Jaziri M.
Vukic A.
6-36-4
Machac T.[6]
Coppejans K.
6-26-3
Bergs Z.
Marterer M.
6-26-1
Kopriva V.
Michalski D.
6-26-2
Paire B.[1]
Andreozzi G.
6-42-67-5
Ehrat S.
Moraing M.
6-756-46-4
Kovalik J.[4]
Horansky F.
7-656-3