Henri Laaksonen vs Mats Rosenkranz — Braunschweig CH Round of 32

Braunschweig CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
SUI5
Henri Laaksonen
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 5 July 2021
clay
GER
Mats Rosenkranz
#358ATP
1454ELO
1320Clay ELO
27 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWWLW
Laaksonen H.
6-3 6-2
Rosenkranz M.
Laaksonen H.
662
Rosenkranz M.
320

Henri Laaksonen defeated Mats Rosenkranz 6-3 6-2 in the Braunschweig CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Laaksonen H.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Rosenkranz M.

Rosenkranz M.serving84% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Laaksonen H.

Serve advantage — Rosenkranz M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Laaksonen H.Rosenkranz M.
1st serve in·Even
56%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
70%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
61%
66%
Return points won·Even
37%
35%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
66%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.3
8.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.7
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (165 vs 181). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Laaksonen H.Rosenkranz M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
51
31
Break points saved·Even
84
86
Break points won·Clear edge
20
1
Deciding sets·Dominant
92
64
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
25
6

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Laaksonen H.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Rosenkranz M.
3.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 238 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.4
Surface form
1.7
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.3
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
3.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Altmaier D.[8]
Laaksonen H.[5]
6-16-2
Semi-finals
Altmaier D.[8]
Moeller M.
7-56-0
Laaksonen H.[5]
Kopriva V.
6-46-0
Quarter-finals
Moeller M.
Hassan B.
6-46-2
Altmaier D.[8]
Ymer E.
6-36-3
Laaksonen H.[5]
Kovalik J.[4]
6-36-2
Kopriva V.
Bergs Z.
3-66-07-5
R16
Hassan B.
Ehrat S.
4-66-36-4
Moeller M.
Nagal S.[7]
6-31-66-2
Ymer E.
Hanfmann Y.[3]
2-66-36-2
Altmaier D.[8]
Vilella Martinez M.
6-36-2
Kovalik J.[4]
Jaziri M.
6-17-5
Bergs Z.
Machac T.[6]
7-655-76-4
Kopriva V.
Paire B.[1]
6-12-66-2
Laaksonen H.[5]
Kuhn N.
6-47-5
R32
Hassan B.
Kelly D.
6-47-67
Moeller M.
Gabashvili T.
7-56-3
Nagal S.[7]
Safwat M.
6-37-63
Hanfmann Y.[3]
Diez S.
7-52-66-3
Ymer E.
Kamke T.
6-37-5
Vilella Martinez M.
Molleker R.
3-66-46-3
Altmaier D.[8]
Kolar Z.
6-27-5
Laaksonen H.[5]
Rosenkranz M.
6-36-2
Kuhn N.
Zverev M.
6-27-64
Jaziri M.
Vukic A.
6-36-4
Machac T.[6]
Coppejans K.
6-26-3
Bergs Z.
Marterer M.
6-26-1
Kopriva V.
Michalski D.
6-26-2
Paire B.[1]
Andreozzi G.
6-42-67-5
Ehrat S.
Moraing M.
6-756-46-4
Kovalik J.[4]
Horansky F.
7-656-3