Holger Rune vs Lukas Klein — Perugia CH Round of 16

Perugia CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Holger Rune
DEN
Holger Rune
#81ATP
1757ELO
1729Clay ELO
$0YTD
$16MCAREER
23 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 5 July 2021
clay
Lukas Klein
SVK
Lukas Klein
#185ATP
1601ELO
1624Clay ELO
$64kYTD
$1.3MCAREER
28 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWWWLW
Rune H.
6-4 6-4
Klein L.
Rune H.
662
Klein L.
440

Holger Rune defeated Lukas Klein 6-4 6-4 in the Perugia CH round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Holger Rune came in ranked #81.

Key context

  • Match story: Holger Rune edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Rune H.serving84% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Klein L.

Klein L.serving84% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Rune H.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Rune H.Klein L.
1st serve in·Even
62%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
52%
Service points won·Even
66%
65%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Even
65%
63%
Aces / match·Even
5.9
5.6
Double faults / match·Even
3.2
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Rune H.Klein L.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
91
39
Break points saved·Slight edge
99
92
Break points won·Dominant
84
1
Deciding sets·Dominant
98
63
Tiebreaks·Dominant
99
31

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Rune H.
7.3
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Klein L.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
6.6+105 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.4Clay Elo 1624
7.3Overall Elo 1757
ELO gap
2.7Overall Elo 1601
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.8
Surface form
4.6
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
5.5
Minutes 14d
6.3
7.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Etcheverry T.[7]
Sachko V.
7-56-2
Semi-finals
Etcheverry T.[7]
Caruso S.[1]
7-55-76-2
Sachko V.
Serdarusic N.
6-47-5
Quarter-finals
Etcheverry T.[7]
Fatic N.
6-36-1
Sachko V.
Rune H.
6-37-64
Serdarusic N.
Skatov T.
6-766-46-4
Caruso S.[1]
Cobolli F.
6-43-66-3
R16
Sachko V.
Moroni G.
7-54-66-4
Cobolli F.
Baldi F.
6-27-63
Rune H.
Klein L.
6-46-4
Serdarusic N.
Zhang Z.[4]
7-666-4
Skatov T.
Olivo R.[8]
7-57-5
Etcheverry T.[7]
Stricker D.
7-56-4
Fatic N.
Kuzmanov D.
6-47-65
Caruso S.[1]
Forti F.
6-46-4
R32
Klein L.
Bonadio R.
6-17-64
Rune H.
Fabbiano T.[5]
6-14-66-2
Zhang Z.[4]
Passaro F.
3-66-36-2
Serdarusic N.
Pellegrino A.
6-36-3
Skatov T.
Giustino L.
1-67-656-0
Fatic N.
Cachin P.
6-47-65
Kuzmanov D.
Gaio F.[3]
2-66-37-62
Cobolli F.
Popko D.[6]
2-67-57-63
Forti F.
Collarini A.
4-67-56-1
Caruso S.[1]
Vanni L.
7-656-4
Sachko V.
Martin A.[2]
6-33-66-2
Moroni G.
Furness E.
2-0
Baldi F.
Borges N.
3-63-5
Olivo R.[8]
Zeppieri G.
6-757-56-2
Etcheverry T.[7]
Arnaboldi A.
7-636-2
Stricker D.
Maden Y.
7-636-1