Elias Ymer vs Tobias Kamke — Braunschweig CH Round of 32

Braunschweig CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Elias Ymer
SWE
Elias Ymer
#183ATP
1548ELO
1492Clay ELO
$191kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 5 July 2021
clay
GER
Tobias Kamke
40 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLWLWL
Ymer E.
6-3 7-5
Kamke T.
Ymer E.
672
Kamke T.
350

Elias Ymer defeated Tobias Kamke 6-3 7-5 in the Braunschweig CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Tobias Kamke came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Elias Ymer claimed a first win over Tobias Kamke in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Elias Ymer closed it out in two sets, 6–3 7–5.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2016-10-17StockholmR32hardTobias Kamke6-4 6-0

Serve vs return

This season
Ymer E.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Kamke T.

Kamke T.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Ymer E.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ymer E.Kamke T.
1st serve in·Even
60%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
49%
Service points won·Even
61%
60%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
58%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.7
1.6
Double faults / match·Even
3.1
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 60). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ymer E.Kamke T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
48
14
Break points saved·Clear edge
83
69
Break points won·Even
23
22
Deciding sets·Dominant
78
17
Tiebreaks·Dominant
35
7

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ymer E.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Kamke T.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
6.9
Surface form
4.6
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.2
Minutes 14d
9.1
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Ymer E.Kamke T.
Freshness·
100
—

Ymer E.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Altmaier D.[8]
Laaksonen H.[5]
6-16-2
Semi-finals
Altmaier D.[8]
Moeller M.
7-56-0
Laaksonen H.[5]
Kopriva V.
6-46-0
Quarter-finals
Moeller M.
Hassan B.
6-46-2
Altmaier D.[8]
Ymer E.
6-36-3
Laaksonen H.[5]
Kovalik J.[4]
6-36-2
Kopriva V.
Bergs Z.
3-66-07-5
R16
Hassan B.
Ehrat S.
4-66-36-4
Moeller M.
Nagal S.[7]
6-31-66-2
Ymer E.
Hanfmann Y.[3]
2-66-36-2
Altmaier D.[8]
Vilella Martinez M.
6-36-2
Kovalik J.[4]
Jaziri M.
6-17-5
Bergs Z.
Machac T.[6]
7-655-76-4
Kopriva V.
Paire B.[1]
6-12-66-2
Laaksonen H.[5]
Kuhn N.
6-47-5
R32
Hassan B.
Kelly D.
6-47-67
Moeller M.
Gabashvili T.
7-56-3
Nagal S.[7]
Safwat M.
6-37-63
Hanfmann Y.[3]
Diez S.
7-52-66-3
Ymer E.
Kamke T.
6-37-5
Vilella Martinez M.
Molleker R.
3-66-46-3
Altmaier D.[8]
Kolar Z.
6-27-5
Laaksonen H.[5]
Rosenkranz M.
6-36-2
Kuhn N.
Zverev M.
6-27-64
Jaziri M.
Vukic A.
6-36-4
Machac T.[6]
Coppejans K.
6-26-3
Bergs Z.
Marterer M.
6-26-1
Kopriva V.
Michalski D.
6-26-2
Paire B.[1]
Andreozzi G.
6-42-67-5
Ehrat S.
Moraing M.
6-756-46-4
Kovalik J.[4]
Horansky F.
7-656-3