Holger Rune vs Thomas Fabbiano — Perugia CH Round of 32

Perugia CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Holger Rune
DEN
Holger Rune
#81ATP
1757ELO
1729Clay ELO
$0YTD
$16MCAREER
23 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 5 July 2021
clay
ITA5
Thomas Fabbiano
37 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLWL
Rune H.
6-1 4-6 6-2
Fabbiano T.
Rune H.
6462
Fabbiano T.
1621

Holger Rune defeated Thomas Fabbiano 6-1 4-6 6-2 in the Perugia CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Holger Rune came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Holger Rune extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Holger Rune came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 4–6 6–2.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-09-20MetzQ1hardHolger Rune3-6 6-3 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Rune H.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Fabbiano T.

Fabbiano T.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Rune H.

Serve advantage — Rune H.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Rune H.Fabbiano T.
1st serve in·Even
62%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
59%
Return points won·Even
36%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
57%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.8
2.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.2
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 92). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Rune H.Fabbiano T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
91
28
Break points saved·Clear edge
99
81
Break points won·Dominant
84
16
Deciding sets·Dominant
98
28
Tiebreaks·Dominant
99
44

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Rune H.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Fabbiano T.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
7.8
Surface form
4.3
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
5.5
Minutes 14d
8.3
7.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
6.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Etcheverry T.[7]
Sachko V.
7-56-2
Semi-finals
Etcheverry T.[7]
Caruso S.[1]
7-55-76-2
Sachko V.
Serdarusic N.
6-47-5
Quarter-finals
Etcheverry T.[7]
Fatic N.
6-36-1
Sachko V.
Rune H.
6-37-64
Serdarusic N.
Skatov T.
6-766-46-4
Caruso S.[1]
Cobolli F.
6-43-66-3
R16
Sachko V.
Moroni G.
7-54-66-4
Cobolli F.
Baldi F.
6-27-63
Rune H.
Klein L.
6-46-4
Serdarusic N.
Zhang Z.[4]
7-666-4
Skatov T.
Olivo R.[8]
7-57-5
Etcheverry T.[7]
Stricker D.
7-56-4
Fatic N.
Kuzmanov D.
6-47-65
Caruso S.[1]
Forti F.
6-46-4
R32
Klein L.
Bonadio R.
6-17-64
Rune H.
Fabbiano T.[5]
6-14-66-2
Zhang Z.[4]
Passaro F.
3-66-36-2
Serdarusic N.
Pellegrino A.
6-36-3
Skatov T.
Giustino L.
1-67-656-0
Fatic N.
Cachin P.
6-47-65
Kuzmanov D.
Gaio F.[3]
2-66-37-62
Cobolli F.
Popko D.[6]
2-67-57-63
Forti F.
Collarini A.
4-67-56-1
Caruso S.[1]
Vanni L.
7-656-4
Sachko V.
Martin A.[2]
6-33-66-2
Moroni G.
Furness E.
2-0
Baldi F.
Borges N.
3-63-5
Olivo R.[8]
Zeppieri G.
6-757-56-2
Etcheverry T.[7]
Arnaboldi A.
7-636-2
Stricker D.
Maden Y.
7-636-1